Chhattisgarh High Court
CRR/282/2000 of Baji Rao Banjari Vs Manik Lal on 13 December 2000
CF0000088401 649‘!“ , REEEWEB {m TRmSEER’;N ma HIGH cmRT 9E- mxcmum AT JABALLHR ‘ cnom 3- m5“ RIMINAL REvIsmN N0. Q3)— {3F 2906 mqw Bemh kCrmma‘» uunkCM” mu coU F B ”SP“ gATHSGARHg REVISI'QN U/S 397/40; cm? OF
JIl IHIIIIHHHHHHIHHIHCF0000088401,649‘!“
‘9E- mxcmum AT JABALLHRREEEWEB[{m][ TRmSEER’;N][ ma][ HIGH][ cmRT]cnom[[3-][ m5“]][[ m5“]]RIMINAL REvIsmN REvIsmNN0.[Q3][)—]{3F2906mqw[Bemh][ k][Crmma‘»]uunkCM”F[[B][ ”SP“]][[ ”SP“]]mu[[coU]]gATHSGARHgREVISI'QNU/S397/40;[cm?][ OF][ CRIMINAL][ PRGCEDURE]J.97$APPLICANT:BaJi Rao, Rao,Banjarl,aged about50 years, years,CompliainantRespondent0.2son of Kanshiram Banjari, of Kanshiram Banjari, Kanshiram Banjari, Banjari,r/o Mahasamnd, cnom[[3-][ m5“]][[ m5“]]RIMINAL REvIsmN REvIsmNuunkCM”F[[B][ ”SP“]][[ ”SP“]]mu[[coU]]mgATHSGARHgREVISI'QNU/S
BaJi Rao, Rao,Banjarl,aged about50 years, years,son of Kanshiram Banjari, of Kanshiram Banjari, Kanshiram Banjari, Banjari,r/o Mahasamnd,P,.S.and [Tehsil][ Mahasamtmd.]EistrictEafiasamund.
V/s
NaN-APPLICANTSQAccused!Appellants.
1. Manikii’walaged30yeiars,2.Trilochan,aged28 yrs.
Bothsonsof $etram Chandrakar.agrlculturlsts,r/oGram Kullya,P.S.Baahara,Tahsll Mahasamund,Eistt.Eaha§nnné.
Respondént No.1
3. State of Madhyaradeshthrough P.S.Maha’§amund.
CRmINAL REVISIgN U
,97082 CroP.C.
v/
>
:ETBECTON OFFICer C6gyTST.UT> QRAMATEIEGa OH[COURT,][ BLAIS]Pg RSarmen weg fede] 2.900(T) aONot fae ona =miwemmmnie| eeta: - \>\ A-Pevo:| eee Be aa oa _me ;pT-rr ere Oe Singling ey is|_pppoe. tre pekiMeon tspOe||
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…