Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31023/2024 of VAVILI RAJESH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 31 December 2024
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT^C^^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31023 OF 2024 Av -O' p's! ''r- t. Between: 1. Vavili Rajesh, S/o
n.r
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT^C^^Av(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Av-O'p's!''r-t.
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURPRESENTTHE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPAWRIT PETITION NO: 31023 OF 2024
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VaviliRajesh,S/oSundararamaiah,Agedabout37years,Occ:Software Employee,R/o D No.26/1/698(old) 26/14/65new,AchariStreet, B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore[District]Software Employee,R/o D No.26/1/698(old) 26/14/65new,AchariStreet, B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore[District]
2. Vavila Sundara Ramaiah, S/o Vavila Rangaiah, Aged about 67 years,OccRetired Headmaster,R/o DNo. 26/1/698(old) 26/14/65newAchari Street, B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore[District]OccRetired Headmaster,R/o DNo. 26/1/698(old) 26/14/65newAchari Street, B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore[District]3. Vavila Sulochanamma, W/o Sundara Ramaiah, Aged about 59 years,Occ Housewife, R/o D No. 26/1/698 (old) 26/14/65 new, Achari Street,B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore District.Occ Housewife, R/o D No. 26/1/698 (old) 26/14/65 new, Achari Street,B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore District.
4. Hemalatha, W/o Srinivasan, Aged about 42 years, Occ Housewife, R/o7/15, Muniappa Street, Royapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.7/15, Muniappa Street, Royapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.
5. Swarna Latha, W/o D. Srinivasan, Aged about 39 years,[Occ][ Teacher]R/oD.No.4/433,JeevarathinamNagar,1ststreet,Palavakkam,Sholinganur Sub district, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.R/oD.No.4/433,JeevarathinamNagar,1ststreet,Palavakkam,Sholinganur Sub district, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.
6. D. Srinivasan, S/o Devaraj, Aged about 50 years,[Occ][ business]R/oD.No.4/433,JeevarathinamNagar,1ststreet,Palavakkam,Sholinganur Sub district, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.D.No.4/433,JeevarathinamNagar,1ststreet,Palavakkam,Sholinganur Sub district, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.
...PETITIONERS
AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, HomeDepartment, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,[Guntur]District, A.P.Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,[Guntur]District, A.P.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore City, S.P.S.R.[Nellore][ District]
Nellore Rural, S.P.S.R. Nellore
3. The Deputy Superintendent of PoliceDistrictTP Gudur Police Station, T.P Gudur, S.P.S.R.DistrictTP Gudur Police Station, T.P Gudur, S.P.S.R.
4. The Inspector of Police
Nellore District
5. The Station House Officer, T.P Gudur Poiioe Station,T.P Gudur S.P.S.R. Nellore District W/o Vavili Rajesh, D/o P Varaprasad,AgedNo.27-4-1283, Lakshmi Nivas, ChaitanyaNellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore DistrictNellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore District
6. Vavili Lakshmi Prasannaabout 29 years, R/o D.Paradise Street, Balajinagarabout 29 years, R/o D.Paradise Street, Balajinagar
...RESPONDENTS
of the Constitution of India praying that inPetition under Article 226affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maythe circumstances stated in theparticularly one in thea writ, order or direction, morebe pleased to issuethe action of the Respondents hereinnature of Writ of Mandamus declaringand5hereininmakingunnecessaryespecially the respondentNo.4between the Petitionerattempts to settle the matrimonial disputes pendingto withdraw F.C.O.Pand the Respondent no.6 by threatening the petitionersOf Hon’ble Family Judge Cum VI(CFR No. 5621of 2024) on the fileand furthermore threatening to file falseAdditional District Judge, Nelloreillegal, arbitrary and against the Principlescases against the petitioners asofConstitutionofIndiaandofNaturalJusticeandArticles14,21No.4 and5not tointerferewithconsequentlydirect the Respondentand the Unofficial Respondentsdisputes pending between the PetitionersNo.6.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, the High Court may beand 5 not to interfere with matrimonialpleased to direct respondents No.4disputes pending between the petitioners and RespondentNo. 6 and also .7
*
r 'h m
•V/
jf
:m:A
f
call the petitioners to the policeand5*'^ respondents not todirect the 4in the interest of justice.stationand threaten them with dire consequences in /
; SRI AYESHA AZMA S
Counsel for the Petitioners.1 to to 5; GP FOR HOMECounsel for the Respondent NosCounsel for the Respondent No.6;—TheCourt made the following; ORDER
.1 to to 5; GP FOR HOME/
/
APHC010592642024IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THEHONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 31023/2024
Between;
Vavili Rajesh and Others
The State Of Ap and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner{S):
AND
...PETITIONER(S)
...RESPONDENT{S)
1. AYESHAAZMAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the followingORDER;
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution[of][ India][ with]
the following prayer for;
“...To Issue a writ order or direction, more particularly[one][ In][ the]natureof Writof Mandamus,declaringtheactionoftheRespondents herein especially the respondent Nos.4and5herein in making unnecessary attempts to settle the[matrimonial]disputes pending between the Petitioner andNo.6 by threatening the petitioners to withdraw F.C.O.P((^hh(No 5621 of 2024) on the file of Hon’ble Family Judge[Cum]VIAdditional District Judge, Nellore and furthermore[threatening][ to]file false cases against the petitioners as illegal,[arbitrary][ and]against the Principles of Natural Justice and Articles[14,][ 21][ of]Constitution of India and consequently direct the RespondentNos. 4 and 5 not to interfere with disputes pending[between][ the]Petitioners and the Unofficial Respondents No 6 ....”
2. Heard the learned counsel forthe Petitioners andlearned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Home for therespondents.the Petitioners andlearned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Home for therespondents.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitionerswould submit that Petitioner No.1,whois the husband already fileda divorcepetition and the Policeareunnecessarily calling the husband and all the familymembers to the PoliceStation relating to matrimonial dispute,Learned counsel further submits thatthe Police are threatening the PetitionerNo.1 to withdraw the divorce petitionor else they may lodge false complaint against him.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleaderwould submit that the Courtmay pass appropriate orders.would submit that the Courtmay pass appropriate orders.
5. Considering the submissionsmade,it is trite to reiterate the settledprinciple that the Police haveno role to interfere in civil disputes andcoercethe parties to compromise their civil disputes.Whenthepartiesarenotinterested to compromise ina family counselling, it is for the Police to proceedstrictly as per law and not indulge in undue exercises of power.made,it is trite to reiterate the settledprinciple that the Police haveno role to interfere in civil disputes andcoercethe parties to compromise their civil disputes.Whenthepartiesarenotinterested to compromise ina family counselling, it is for the Police to proceedstrictly as per law and not indulge in undue exercises of power.
6. In that view, the Writ Petitionis disposed of, directing the Policetoproceed strictly in accordance with law.No costs.is disposed of, directing the Policetoproceed strictly in accordance with law.No costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- K.J.RAJA B^UASSISTANT REGII^TRAR
To,
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh,Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P.Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P.
V
S.P.S.R. Nellore Districtof Police, Nellore City2. The SuperintendentRural. S.P.S.R. NelloreSuperintendent of Police, Nellore3. The Deputy:District_ T.P Gudur, S.P.S.R.TP Gudur Police Station4. The Inspector of PoliceNellore DistrictPolice Station, T.P Gudur,House Officer, T.P Gudur5. The StationS.P.S.R. Nellore DistrictS, Advocate [OPUC]6. OneCC to Sri Ayesha Azmaof Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]7. TwoCCS to GP for Home, High Court8. Three CD Copies.ssb HIGH COURT
DATED:31/12/2024
ORDERWP.No.31023of 2024
ofX2 7 ,IAN 2325^. Current Section%^°gSPATCW^f^
DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS