Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/31023/2024 of VAVILI RAJESH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 31 December 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT^C^^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31023 OF 2024 Av -O' p's! ''r- t. Between: 1. Vavili Rajesh, S/o

n.r

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT^C^^Av(Special Original Jurisdiction)

Av-O'p's!''r-t.

TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURPRESENTTHE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPAWRIT PETITION NO: 31023 OF 2024

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. VaviliRajesh,S/oSundararamaiah,Agedabout37years,Occ:Software Employee,R/o D No.26/1/698(old) 26/14/65new,AchariStreet, B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore[District]Software Employee,R/o D No.26/1/698(old) 26/14/65new,AchariStreet, B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore[District]

2. Vavila Sundara Ramaiah, S/o Vavila Rangaiah, Aged about 67 years,OccRetired Headmaster,R/o DNo. 26/1/698(old) 26/14/65newAchari Street, B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore[District]OccRetired Headmaster,R/o DNo. 26/1/698(old) 26/14/65newAchari Street, B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore[District]3. Vavila Sulochanamma, W/o Sundara Ramaiah, Aged about 59 years,Occ Housewife, R/o D No. 26/1/698 (old) 26/14/65 new, Achari Street,B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore District.Occ Housewife, R/o D No. 26/1/698 (old) 26/14/65 new, Achari Street,B.V. Nagar, Nellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore District.

4. Hemalatha, W/o Srinivasan, Aged about 42 years, Occ Housewife, R/o7/15, Muniappa Street, Royapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.7/15, Muniappa Street, Royapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

5. Swarna Latha, W/o D. Srinivasan, Aged about 39 years,[Occ][ Teacher]R/oD.No.4/433,JeevarathinamNagar,1ststreet,Palavakkam,Sholinganur Sub district, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.R/oD.No.4/433,JeevarathinamNagar,1ststreet,Palavakkam,Sholinganur Sub district, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

6. D. Srinivasan, S/o Devaraj, Aged about 50 years,[Occ][ business]R/oD.No.4/433,JeevarathinamNagar,1ststreet,Palavakkam,Sholinganur Sub district, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.D.No.4/433,JeevarathinamNagar,1ststreet,Palavakkam,Sholinganur Sub district, Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

...PETITIONERS

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, HomeDepartment, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,[Guntur]District, A.P.Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,[Guntur]District, A.P.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore City, S.P.S.R.[Nellore][ District]

Nellore Rural, S.P.S.R. Nellore

3. The Deputy Superintendent of PoliceDistrictTP Gudur Police Station, T.P Gudur, S.P.S.R.DistrictTP Gudur Police Station, T.P Gudur, S.P.S.R.

4. The Inspector of Police

Nellore District

5. The Station House Officer, T.P Gudur Poiioe Station,T.P Gudur S.P.S.R. Nellore District W/o Vavili Rajesh, D/o P Varaprasad,AgedNo.27-4-1283, Lakshmi Nivas, ChaitanyaNellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore DistrictNellore City, S.P.S.R. Nellore District

6. Vavili Lakshmi Prasannaabout 29 years, R/o D.Paradise Street, Balajinagarabout 29 years, R/o D.Paradise Street, Balajinagar

...RESPONDENTS

of the Constitution of India praying that inPetition under Article 226affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maythe circumstances stated in theparticularly one in thea writ, order or direction, morebe pleased to issuethe action of the Respondents hereinnature of Writ of Mandamus declaringand5hereininmakingunnecessaryespecially the respondentNo.4between the Petitionerattempts to settle the matrimonial disputes pendingto withdraw F.C.O.Pand the Respondent no.6 by threatening the petitionersOf Hon’ble Family Judge Cum VI(CFR No. 5621of 2024) on the fileand furthermore threatening to file falseAdditional District Judge, Nelloreillegal, arbitrary and against the Principlescases against the petitioners asofConstitutionofIndiaandofNaturalJusticeandArticles14,21No.4 and5not tointerferewithconsequentlydirect the Respondentand the Unofficial Respondentsdisputes pending between the PetitionersNo.6.

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, the High Court may beand 5 not to interfere with matrimonialpleased to direct respondents No.4disputes pending between the petitioners and RespondentNo. 6 and also .7

*

r 'h m

•V/

jf

:m:A

f

call the petitioners to the policeand5*'^ respondents not todirect the 4in the interest of justice.stationand threaten them with dire consequences in /

; SRI AYESHA AZMA S

Counsel for the Petitioners.1 to to 5; GP FOR HOMECounsel for the Respondent NosCounsel for the Respondent No.6;—TheCourt made the following; ORDER

.1 to to 5; GP FOR HOME/

/

APHC010592642024IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THEHONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

WRIT PETITION NO: 31023/2024

Between;

Vavili Rajesh and Others

The State Of Ap and Others

Counsel for the Petitioner{S):

AND

...PETITIONER(S)

...RESPONDENT{S)

1. AYESHAAZMAS

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

The Court made the followingORDER;

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution[of][ India][ with]

the following prayer for;

“...To Issue a writ order or direction, more particularly[one][ In][ the]natureof Writof Mandamus,declaringtheactionoftheRespondents herein especially the respondent Nos.4and5herein in making unnecessary attempts to settle the[matrimonial]disputes pending between the Petitioner andNo.6 by threatening the petitioners to withdraw F.C.O.P((^hh(No 5621 of 2024) on the file of Hon’ble Family Judge[Cum]VIAdditional District Judge, Nellore and furthermore[threatening][ to]file false cases against the petitioners as illegal,[arbitrary][ and]against the Principles of Natural Justice and Articles[14,][ 21][ of]Constitution of India and consequently direct the RespondentNos. 4 and 5 not to interfere with disputes pending[between][ the]Petitioners and the Unofficial Respondents No 6 ....”

2. Heard the learned counsel forthe Petitioners andlearned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Home for therespondents.the Petitioners andlearned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Home for therespondents.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitionerswould submit that Petitioner No.1,whois the husband already fileda divorcepetition and the Policeareunnecessarily calling the husband and all the familymembers to the PoliceStation relating to matrimonial dispute,Learned counsel further submits thatthe Police are threatening the PetitionerNo.1 to withdraw the divorce petitionor else they may lodge false complaint against him.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleaderwould submit that the Courtmay pass appropriate orders.would submit that the Courtmay pass appropriate orders.

5. Considering the submissionsmade,it is trite to reiterate the settledprinciple that the Police haveno role to interfere in civil disputes andcoercethe parties to compromise their civil disputes.Whenthepartiesarenotinterested to compromise ina family counselling, it is for the Police to proceedstrictly as per law and not indulge in undue exercises of power.made,it is trite to reiterate the settledprinciple that the Police haveno role to interfere in civil disputes andcoercethe parties to compromise their civil disputes.Whenthepartiesarenotinterested to compromise ina family counselling, it is for the Police to proceedstrictly as per law and not indulge in undue exercises of power.

6. In that view, the Writ Petitionis disposed of, directing the Policetoproceed strictly in accordance with law.No costs.is disposed of, directing the Policetoproceed strictly in accordance with law.No costs.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/- K.J.RAJA B^UASSISTANT REGII^TRAR

To,

SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh,Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P.Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P.

V

S.P.S.R. Nellore Districtof Police, Nellore City2. The SuperintendentRural. S.P.S.R. NelloreSuperintendent of Police, Nellore3. The Deputy:District_ T.P Gudur, S.P.S.R.TP Gudur Police Station4. The Inspector of PoliceNellore DistrictPolice Station, T.P Gudur,House Officer, T.P Gudur5. The StationS.P.S.R. Nellore DistrictS, Advocate [OPUC]6. OneCC to Sri Ayesha Azmaof Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]7. TwoCCS to GP for Home, High Court8. Three CD Copies.ssb HIGH COURT

DATED:31/12/2024

ORDERWP.No.31023of 2024

ofX2 7 ,IAN 2325^. Current Section%^°gSPATCW^f^

DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead