Andhra Pradesh High Court
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS 696 of 2012 on 18 October 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 696 OF 2012
Appeal under Section 82 of ESI Act. against the order passedinESI.No.27 of 1999 on the file of the Judge, Employees InsuranceCourt cumPresiding Officer, Labour Courf, Guntur dated 17-10-2005.
Between:
Jagadishwar Stone Crushers, Donka, PerecherlaGuntur., Rep. by itsManaging Partner, T.Subba Reddy
...Appellant/Petitioner
AND
1. The Assistant Director, ESI Corporation, Regional OfficeHyderabad
2. The Manager, ESI Corporation, Local Office, Kothapeta,Guntur.
...Respondents/Respondents
Counsel for the Appellant; Sri C Niranjan Rao (No Representation )
Counsel for the Respondents: Sri V .C.H Naidu The Court made the following:
,/a
APHC010723952012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3460]
FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 696/2012
Page 1 of 2
Between:
...APPELLANT
Jagadishwar Stone Crushers, Perecherla, Guntur.
AND
...RESPONDENT{S)
The Asst Director, ESI Corporation, Hyderabad & Others Counsel for the Appellant:
1.C N IRAN JAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.PASHAM SRINIVASULU
2.PUSHPINDER KAUR
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAYCIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL N0.696 of 2012
JUDGMENT:
1. The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against[the][ Order]dated18.10.2005inE.S.I.No.27 of 1999 passed by the[Presiding]Officer, Labour Court, Guntur, Guntur District.dated18.10.2005inE.S.I.No.27 of 1999 passed by the[Presiding]Officer, Labour Court, Guntur, Guntur District.
2. There wasnorepresentationonbehalfoftheAppellant.It appears that the Appellant is not interested to[prosecute][ the][ case.]Therefore, the C.M.A is dismissed for non-prosecution.It appears that the Appellant is not interested to[prosecute][ the][ case.]Therefore, the C.M.A is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Thereshall benoorder as to costs. As a sequel, pendingapplications, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- S.V.S.R. MURTHY
//TRUE COPY//
JOINT REGISTRAR
To,
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur, Gunur[District.]
2. One CC to Sri C Niranjan Rao Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri V.C.H Naidu Advocate [OPUC]
4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra[Pradesh][ at]
Amaravathi.
5. Three CD Copies
SAM
HIGH COURT
DATED;14/02/2025
JUDGMENT
CMA.No.696 of 2012
dismissing the C.M.A FOR I^ON-PROSECUTION
%
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…