Gujarat High Court
AO/6/1993 of VALLABHBHAI PANCHABHAI Vs BHIMJI ARJANBHAI on 17 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 6 of 1993 With CIVIL APPLICATION 171 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 6 of 1993
With
CIVIL APPLICATION 171 of 1993
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- VALLABHBHAI PANCHABHAI
Versus
BHIMJI ARJANBHAI
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR SURESH M SHAH for Appellants
MR PM THAKKAR for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
Date of decision: 17/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. As a result of the hearing and discussion, a consensus has been arrived at between the learned counsel,on the basis of which, following directions are given :
(1) The trial court shall hear and dispose of the pending Suit as expeditiously as possible and in any case, not later than 30th April, 1999.
In view of the aforesaid directions, the learned counsel for the appellants does not press this appeal for any further reliefs and the same is accordingly disposed of with no order asto costs.
Since the main appeal has been disposed of to-day, the above application also does not survive and the same is accordingly disposed of with no order asto costs.
It is clarified that until the Suit is disposed of, interim order passed by the trial court (which was subject matter of the present appeal) shall continue to operate.
Registry is directed to send yadi to the trial court forthwith that is to say , not later than 22nd December, 1999. Directe service is also permitted.
mim/-