Gujarat High Court

SCA/11148/2001 of RANCHHODBHAI DEVRAJBHAI VAGHRI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 23 January 2002

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 11148 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA sd/- and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 11148 of 2001

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA sd/-

and

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI sd/-

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RANCHHODBHAI DEVRAJBHAI VAGHRI

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:

1. Special Civil Application No. 11148 of 2001 MR AJ PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MR SP SEN, A.G.P. for Respondents No. 1,3 MR SN SHELAT, for MR MITUL K SHELAT for Respondent No. 2

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA

and

MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI

Date of decision: 23/01/2002

(Per : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA)

Rule. Mr.Sen, learned A.G.P. waives service of Rule on behalf of Respondents No.1 & 3 and Mr.S.N.Shelat, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for Shri Mitul Shelat, learned Advocate, waives service of Rule on beahlf of Respondent No.2.

Page 1 of 2

Shri Munshi, for Shri A.J.Patel, learned Counsel, seeks permission to withdraw this petition on the solemn statement made by learned Counsel Shri Shelat for respondent No.2 - G.I.D.C. Reply Affidavit is produced on record. Shri Shelat for the respondent No.2

Corporation further states that they will deposit the amount before the competent Authority i.e. Special Land Acquisition Officer within 2 months from today. On depositing the said amount the petitioner shall be permitted to withdraw the same.

In view of above statement the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition.

Permission to withdraw this petition granted. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged with no order as to costs.

������sd/-

�����(B.J.Shethna, J.)

Date : January 23, 2002���sd/-

�����(N. G. Nandi, J.)

*sas*

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead