Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/3903/2013 of Shri Kameshwar and Anr. Vs Chairman Cum Managing Dire. and Ors. on 20 December 2013
P H ^ \.- ^ i > ( 1 » , ^ ^ 5* P 5 » » ^ F IQ ^ i — ! o > -i ~ f /— < ' ^ J -i < — ! 1 -^ c: j1 ^ » \~^ > c; is 'lg i M y 's s '"" s~ i 2U " M n. n f- t- h ^~ ! [^ \ o >-{ •" i o S ^ & . y a . i3- !? \s i''^
l«-
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPURWRIT PETITION (S) N0.3903 OF 2013
PETITIONERSShri Kameshwar and another.
VersusRESPONDENTSChairmancumManagingDirectorandothers.
Ms. Pankhuri Saxena, counsel for the petitioner.
SINGLE BENCH:HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA. J.ORAL ORDER(20/12/2013)
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that vide order dated07/03/2012petitionershavebeenpromotedtothenexthighercategory/grade as Service Linked Promotion in accordance with the cadrescheme and they have been granted benefit of htgher pay scale, however,the designation of the promoted post is not mentioned in their pay slip. Shewould submit that despite submission of representation in form of legalnotice, the grievance is not redressed by the respondents.
2. Learned counsel would submit that for the present respondents maybe directed to consider the representationwhich has been submitted in formof legal notice.
3. Considering the limited nature of relief the present writ petition isdisposed of with a direction that in the event petitioners submit a freshrepresentation before the competent authority of the respondents within a pe-riod of one month from today, the said authority shall consider and decide thesame in accordance with law within a further period ofthree months from thedate of submission ofj'epresentation.
Sd//-Prashant Kumar MishraJudge
~s
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…