Gujarat High Court
FA/1262/1981 of STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRA Vs THAKKER FULCHAND NAGARDAS on 1 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No 1262 of 1981 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
FIRST APPEAL No 1262 of 1981
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRAVersus THAKKER FULCHAND NAGARDAS
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR JD AJMERA for Petitioner
MR GAURANG H BHATT for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 01/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Learned Advocate Shri J.D.Ajmera appearing for the appellant has submitted that during the pendency of the appeal the dispute between the parties has already been resolved as the appellant bank has received the agreed amount from the respondent. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal before effective hearing. Copy of the letter dated 1.12.2000 addressed to the learned advocate by the Manager of the appellant bank is kept on record.
2. Permission for withdrawal of the appeal is granted. Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn before effective hearing with no order as to costs.
1.12.2000����(A.R.DAVE,J)