Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/7813/2011 of KRISHI SAKH SAH.SAM.KENA MRYD. Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS. on 16 December 2011
HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C)No. ‘qglB [2011 PETITIONER : Krishi Sakh Sahakari Samiti Kena Maryadit, Raipur, Registration No. 1247, through: its Member namely Harihar Barik, S/o. Vaishtam Barik, aged about 63 years, R/o. village Jalgarh, Post
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Q/
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I‘ISGARHAT BILASPUR
‘qglB
W.P.(C)No.
PETITIONER
:
KrishiSakhSahakariSamitiKenaMaryadit,Raipur,RegistrationNo.Maryadit,Raipur,RegistrationNo.1247,through:itsMembernamelyHariharBarik,S/o.VaishtamBarik,agedabout63years,R/o.villageJalgarh,PostChattigirola,Saraipali,District Mahasamund (C.G.)HariharBarik,S/o.VaishtamBarik,agedabout63years,R/o.villageJalgarh,PostChattigirola,Saraipali,District Mahasamund (C.G.)
RESPONDENTS
VERSUS
StateofChhattisgarh,through:Secretary, Food &Civil Supplies andConsumerProtectionDepartment,Secretary, Food &Civil Supplies andConsumerProtectionDepartment,D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur,DistrictRaipur (C.G.)Raipur (C.G.)
Collector,Mahasamund,DistrictMahasamund (C.G.)Mahasamund (C.G.)
ChhattisgarhRajyaSahakariBankMaryadit,through:itsManagingDirector, Chhattisgarh Rajya SahakariBank Maryadit, HeadOfficer,IndiraGandhiCommercialComplex,Pandari, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)Maryadit,through:itsManagingDirector, Chhattisgarh Rajya SahakariBank Maryadit, HeadOfficer,IndiraGandhiCommercialComplex,Pandari, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
ChiefExecutiveOfficer,DistrictCooperativeCentralBankMaryadit,Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)CooperativeCentralBankMaryadit,Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
NodalOfficer,DistrictCooperativeCentralBankMaryadit,RaipurDistrict Raipur (C.G.)CentralBankMaryadit,RaipurDistrict Raipur (C.G.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 22CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
OF THE
I
Y“;
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHMN AT BILASPURWRIT PETITION (C) N0. 7813 of2011
PETITIONF‘R:KrishiSakhSahakan'SamitiMaryadit, Raipur.VERSUSRESPONDENTS:State of WRIT PETITION UNDERWARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mDIA
SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. AQ‘lgotri. J.
Present:Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioner.Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1 and 2. petitioner.Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1 and 2.
O R D E R(Passed[on]16m day ofDecember, 201 1)
Learnedcounselappearingfor thepetitionersubmitsthatthepetitioner[does]not want to pressother reliefs:except that thepetitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation to therespondent No.1 to consider his application on the basis of severalrecommendations and resolutions, and in turn the respondent No.I may be directed to consider his representation in accordance withlaw, on its own merits and pass appropriate order, at the earliest.Shn'Sao,learnedGovernmentAdvocateappearingfortheState/respondent No.l and 2 submits that if such a representationis made: the same shall be considered expeditiously in accordancewith law.
2.
3. In View of the foregoing;the respondent No.1isdirectedtoconsider his representation as expeditiously as possible, preferablywithina period of twoweekshorn thedate of receipt of theconsider his representation as expeditiously as possible, preferablywithina period of twoweekshorn thedate of receipt of therepresentation,on ownits ownmeritsand perspectiveandinaccordance with law.accordance with law.
4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition isdisposed of. petition isdisposed of.
Sd/—