Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2425/2001 of H.P.LAXME Vs STATE OF C.G. and ORS. on 10 December 2001
COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION No.292f01? 2001. Li Late $hri Jogi Ram Laxme, ' aged about 52 years, Tahsildar, Tahsil Bil aspur, ‘ : District Bilaspur,(C.G. ).\ EgTlTlONER H.P.Laxme, S/o VERSUS ‘r e/ State of Chhatti sgarh, Through : The Secretary, ‘ Revenue
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
INTHEHIG-I COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR.WRIT PETITION No.292f01?2001.
EgTlTlONER
RESPONDEN TS
VERSUS
H.P.Laxme,S/oLi'Late$hriJogiRam Laxme,agedabout 52years,Tahsildar,TahsilBil aspur,‘:District Bilaspur,(C.G. ).\e/‘rStateofChhatti sgarh, sgarh,‘Through:TheSecretary,RevenueDepartment,D.K.S.‘rIL
StateofChhatti sgarh, sgarh,Through:TheSecretary,RevenueDepartment,D.K.S.Bhawan ,Raipur, (C. G. ).
ShriBhupeshBaghel,StateMinisterforRevenue,Department,D.K.S.Bhawan,(Mantralaya),Raipur,(C.G.)‘
Amrit LalDhruw,(Tahsildar)Through:TheSecretary,RevenueDepartment,D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur,(C.G.)./, //226/227OFTHE
PETITIONUNDER
CONSTI TUTION
ARTICLE
EEIT
OFlNDlAs FORISSUE OFANAPPROPRIATEVVRITINTHENATUREggMANDmus/CERTIORARIETC.ORDIRECTION/ORDERINTHELIKE NATUREETC .
TO ,
THEHoN‘BLECHIEF JUSTICEANDHISHON'BLECOMPANIONJUDGES OPTIEHON'BLEHIGH ooum OF JUDICATUREAT/BILASPUR, (CHHATIISGARH).AYTHISi‘JLEASETDYOUR LORDSHIP.3o/ 4"9»égc?e6?\NN,\,~[we]{QgQ‘Wcxi.4\4Qcon td. .. . .2{E01‘.5vQ),CV
g“wi“
v