Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/3327/2003 of RAJKUMAR NAIDU Vs THE STATE OF C.G. AND OTHERS on 5 December 2003
COURT OF CHHATBI$G§RH AT BILA3PUR WRIT PEI‘ITION mo 2:17.-/ /2Qo3 / PETITIOWR s Rajkumar Naidu, Son o£ Shri lbs. Nai<iu, aged about 44 years resiéent of C—33, Bajaj Colony, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur ( c G ye VERsUS kw RESPONDENI‘S lo State o£
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
5IN THE HIGH[COURT][ OF][ CHHATBI$G§RH][ AT]BILA3PURWRITPEI‘ITION mo2:17.-/ /2Qo3/PETITIOWRsRajkumarNaidu,Son o£Shri’lbs.Nai<iu,aged about44 yearsresiéent of C—33,Bajaj Colony,New RajendraNagar,Raipur(c GyeVERsUSkwRESPONDENI‘SloStateo£ Chhattisgarh [through]f.theSecretary,Co—operative:f‘Q!“Departmnt,DcKaSaBhawan,Raipur(Cé).2aTheRegistrar,CanoperativeSociety,State o£ Chhattis—garh,RaipuraDistt:Raigmr(cG).WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLES226/22? OFO'gl'QhgONSTiTUTIONOF II‘EIAhW,‘
WWI‘R‘%€IWéymumLearn€€lStatecmmseiShhi SEghhasnoobjectianfar’paSsm'g[a][ éimction][ to][ raspomléxr] 110,2 to pass ‘i'mal 01th:? m1 thsallquiry i‘épart.HavingEmaili11616311160‘c0m1$€1farthepa'tiwamihavingré‘gaydtothefactsEm§circumstancesofthecase,responclgnt 110,2 is dimcied to pa:;S the &1al order on {he enquixy:epert[submitta}][ to][ 11ml][ by][ the][ E‘]Jquiry Oiiicer within a perisd 0f\twa menihé1’11 accordanm with th‘e law.With the afoIESaiddirectioi1,the petition stands disposed0f.Consequ€nt1y, M.W.P. No.3350/20038E LA, No.97§6;"2003for ui‘gem h€alting also stagcis dis‘Josed of.Certéiieti cap}? as p31“ Rmas.Sd/-L.C.BHAD00Judge {@W