Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/6130/2005 of RAMKRISHNA KULMITRA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS. on 24 December 2014
...••'' ..^' ^ff-^y^ ^.[%%/-""" ^^^^^-\ ^ PAfieNo..j,: 9.^'' V- ..-•' e:.^:\ O, ^VN^- IW <6'°~ y IM 'rant BBGH COOJRT Q»JUIMCATiaBB AT iwraraoiBBR •^- MBsPoiroaaros W.P._4LS^-/2005. $& R&UKffifflaiMk KCTUBWRA Retd. A ^istant Rrofessor S/o
.••*'I'-.•^^^^^-\...••''..^'PAfieNo..j,:^ff-^y^..-•'^.[%%/-""" e:.^:\ O,IW^VN^-9.^''yV-<6'°~IM 'rant BBGH COOJRT Q»JUIMCATiaBB ATW.P._4LS^-/2005. $&iwraraoiBBRR&UKffifflaiMk KCTUBWRARetd. A^istant Rrofessor•^-S/o ^uri^;.^ KulmittaAgedabout63YearsR/oVfflagesindTahsBLormi,District Bilaqaw. (C.G.)viaaso®MBsPoiroaaros( 1.<WATBOy<S6 UME>TBSCtABSKTlB'oug?!,SecretaiyH^ierEducation, D,K. S. Bhavan.MgButralaya, Raipur. (C-G.jl'yDBPAmifflENTOPHIGHER^€EDUCATION,Directorate-^SdeaceCol^eft-eiiiiws,0'^'.>^0Utuversi^r Road Raipur, (C.G.)/3.Bhr. YWESM. aWARTI/^?IS^\"//v.AdditionaiDirector,ffi^ierEducation, Directorate-Sdence(*i^^.v"fii^iCotlegePrevaises, UsdwtsatyRoad Raipur, (C.G.)-/4. WaaiCmU*,GaTOraiaent.Bhanupx^tapdeoP.G.College,KaniGer. EHstt. Kariter, (C.G.)W» orCtaiBTITtnraOW 0» B(IHAIBQR BBWAKCB <W Amffi&jTlie abose nan»dbegs to subnat as uader: -1.As the cause titte. pera.As (he cause titte. per3.OPTJfflB{A^.^y-^WSA
?V^J^^^^ ^u
sunita
i!"°In"^! [-f-}Hilil11S!!
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
SB: HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Writ Petition No. 6130 of 2005
PETITIONER
Ramkrishna Kulmitra
Versus
RESPQNDENTSState of Chhattisgarh and others WR]lI'!FtTl|;l8'rUNDERARTICLE 226/2tyI)F..n£CONSTITUTION OFINDIAife»'stfi)'IB^
ce :
wl"Shri Prakash'';l3^/iB.,®||3y!Ee'TorthePetitioner.Shri Shashankflll^ltBlliyi^rnmentAdvocate forthe State.i&s )RDERVl 2.2014)
y^it^""^^^^-l
NAVIN SINHA. ACTlNjC^SI.l.
Page 1 of 2
1. Heard Learnedthe Petitioner and the State.
1A2.Notwithstanding the passage of over 1 years no applicationhas been filed for substituting the deceased-Petitioner by his legalheirs. Even otherwise the challenge is to an order passed in 1989 in awrit petition instituted in 2005 after superahnuation in 2004.
3. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous byreason ofthe death ofthe original Petitioner.
ACTING%<HIEF JUSTICE
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…