WPS/6698/2014 of Rammani Tripathi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. on 24 December 2014

AiGT

BEFORE THE HON BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAiGTsARH ATBILASPUR (CHHAT‘HSGARH:Writ Petition (S)K / /[[(W]]/2014BILASPUR (CHHAT‘HSGARH:Writ Petition (S)K / /[[(W]]/2014

K / /[[(W]]/2014

(3.8.)

PETmomER.'tkgWW[Lwk9’MW'V m,5,,[k5]VERSUSRESPONDENTS1.2.3.4.M/

Rammani Tripathi,

S/o Late Shri B. P. Tripathi, aged about 58years,Occupation—AssistantSub.Inspector,workingunderthe office.ofPonce Station CM: Line, Rs. Civn Line,District[—]Biiaspur (Chhattisgarh)

Staté of Chhattisgarh, Through:Secretary, Home and Poiice Affairs andfinance, Mahanadi Bhawan, NewMantraiay, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh)Director General of Police, Police HeadQuarter, District e Raipur (C.G.)inspector General of Police, BilaspurRange, District — Bilaspur (C.G.)Superintendent of PoliceBilaspurDistnctBilaspur (C G)

NN‘WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDI

m’mwgfaaay)

WWZ’IWW,mmvaam%aiPvm3n%$ISB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra M1ahan ShrivastavaJ.24.12.2014Shn’ Prakash Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner.Shri Mazid Ali, Panel Lawyer for the State, on advancecopy.‘Heard.Learnedcounselforthc:petitionersubmitsthatthescheme of grant of scale prorrlLotion to remove stagnation isapp1icab1ein thecaseof thepetitioner.Similarlysituatedemployees have been grantedDenefit of scale promotion videorderdated5thMay,2014andasthepetitionerhasremained postedas ASIsinc‘3 2009,heisalsoentitledtosamebenefit.Hesubmitsthat[a][ representation]hasbeenmade which is still'pending consi‘deration.LearnedcounselfortheStatesubmitsthatthepetitioner[should][ approach]tre Inspector General of Police,Who is the competent authorit‘1[to][ consider]such claim.In Viewof theabove,tispetitionisdisposedoff atpresent[with]libertytothe ptitionertofile representationbeforerespondentNo.3,wshallconsiderpetitioner’sclaim’ for grantof scale proOtionin accordance with theGovt.Policy dated10th Augut,2009 andother applicablepolicies[in][ the][ matter.]

‘XI—HC78