Chhattisgarh High Court
WP/2410/2001 of S.L.THETHWAR Vs THE STATE OF C.G. and ORS. on 7 December 2001
COURT OF JUDICA‘I‘URE AT BILAsPUR g‘w_wu ” A A 1 w.p.jno§. VZWO [2001 APPL;ICANT i ‘r i Sri SL Thethwar, Slo Mahgal .~ Prasad Thcthwar, Aged about 47 years, worlung as Ass1stant>' I Teacher in the Govt‘Natwar Hlgher ' ‘ ,Secondary Sch‘bol,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
r WM.
AA
iIN1g‘w_wuIE HIGH[COURT][ OF][ JUDICA‘I‘URE][ AT][ BILAsPUR]”1w.p.jno§.VZWO[2001
SriSLThethwar,SloMahgal.~Agedabout[47]Prasad[Thcthwar,]worlungasAss1stant>'years,'Teacher[in the][ Govt‘Natwar][ Hlgher]Sch‘bol,Raigath,I,SecondaryiDistt:[Raigarh.](c.G.)
APPL;ICANT‘r‘ii3ii
xL
ofChhattiSgah,1.[\/S<ta]Thmughi,The36mm‘Vof_SchooliDeliartmentEducatioh,D.K.Building;’'VRaipurr (Chhatiisgarh).
_
The[Commissioner;][ §i1a$pur,:]'Bilaspm[Division;]Chhamsgarh.
il
omcgf,'.\j
DistrictEducau'on./RaxgarhVD1stnct[Ralgarh](C[G)]M.P.Statc[Aaminisnmive]’I‘n'bunal Bench, Raipur‘sua’r.Through[its]'‘kz27F11109:; :wm'rm'rmonuumnmazasauunwol.j:[cons'rrru'non][ or][ 11mm][ FOR]nmcrl[ I]'[x][ ro]'[ n]o€smunm[wRrr][ ommn][ on]‘_,‘%Jus'nca[m][ 11m][ MATTER]-3‘‘DETAILS[or][ 11m][ m'rmou]i1-.Prams[of][ the][ gtjtioqier.]As per[c’ause'][ titl]e.
k
I‘;
[/JA“—.-
i
XI~HC~22
axrwammw
WWW, m, W31
m9. \mx......................................wmwVi200
WW WTWRmmmvfw$Wwi‘‘w
tranSferred teachers sho uld join at their place of posting sothat. interest of the stude nts, institution and petitioners may\be safeguarded. safeguarded..r’”t be safeguarded. safeguarded.
We have given ourthoughtful consideration on all theaspects of the matter.I n the best interest of the students,institutions and petition 3rs Whose cases have already beenscrutinized and that thetransfer being exigency of service,therationalizationis be Lng carried on in the larger publicinterest as well as in tht[:] interest of education in this tribalState, no case for interfei['ence]is made out at this stage.
Having thus considered the facts and circumstances ofthe case it is just and proper that a direction be issued thatthose who,includingtht 3 petitioners, have not joined’theirplace[of]postingto join inmiediately latest by l5_th December,200 1 at their respective I[ilace]of posting,[work][ for][ a] month[ 0r]soin order to know theground[realities][ and][ situation][ and][ if]\[11%W
XI—Hc-zz