Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/7556/2007 of SUSHILA BAI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and 3 ORS. on 20 December 2007
HIGH COURT OF CHI-IAT'HS Writ Petition S E9, 7556 of Z007 PETX‘HONERS 1 Smt. Bhagwam, Sushila Agad about Bai, 45 Win years, Shri Rf o Village Arand, P.O. Basin, Tahsil Rajim, Dis’m’ct Raipur {CG} 2. Tukamm Vadu (Vadavx Sic Late Yogeshwan' Sahu Aged about‘ 42 years, R{o
GARH[BILA3PUR]
HIGH[COURT][ OF][ CHI-IAT'HS]Writ[Petition][ S][ E9,][ 7556][ of][ Z007]
Versus
WRIT[PETITION][ UNDER][ ARTICLE][ 22.6][ OF][ THE][ CONSTITUTION]OF IRDIA
Aggearance:Shri[RR.][ Pali,][ cmmsd][ for][ the.][ petitioners.]
ShriPradecpSingh,PanelLaywcrfortheState]respondents:
V ft//
‘
\i/
x
\
ORAL[012mm](20.[1?..2037)]
SUNIL KUMAR[ SINHA:][ J.]
Heard.
bEarnedcounselfor- thepstitionerssubmitsthat.ai3 to beretiredat the[aga][ of][ 62]years[in]permanent[Gangvman]accordancewith[the][ Chhattisgarh][ Simskiya][ Sevak][ (Adhivarshiki—]He a1$oFundamental[RHIES,][ 56.]Ayu) Adhiniyam[1][ 967][ read][ With]snbmits[that][ the]yoirit[raised][ has][ been][ decided][ hy][ this][ Cmut][ in]hatchofmattersLe.[W.P.Nn.]108,!2005[and][ many][ nther][ c61inected]matterson04.013007,reported[in][ 2007](2)[c.G.L.J.][ 29][ Iamm]
vatu'
a; athers Vs. State of C.G.) and this matmr is squarejy coveredby that decision, which may be disposed ofon the same[terms.]
Ixmnled counsel for the State. fairly agmas[that][ fhis]mattaris covared by tha said decision.Howevar; he submits fhat in somamatters the State has filed Writ appcam.
UnleSS some interim onier is passed, mash;[(m]account offiling of the writ appeal; lmaring of this writ patitjon cannot hekept in abeyancm whan the matter is Squamly[covcmd][ hy][ fhe][ said]jud gment.
In the msuh‘, this petition is anowed,
Itisdisposedof interms0f theorderdatedG4.1.2GQ7in W.P.No.108/2005 andother coniiectmimatters.Nopassedorder as. t0 costs.
ySdl-Sunil Kumar SinhaJudge
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…