Chhattisgarh High Court

MCRC/7173/2015 of Hemant Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 23 December 2015

OF CHHATTISGARH, BIL Order Sheet MCRC No. 7173 of 2015 • Hemant Kumar Sahu S/o Gokul Ram Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Qwarter No. 99/ G Risali Sector Bhilai, Civil & Revenue Distt. Durg Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner Versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer,

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BIL

Order Sheet

MCRC No. 7173 of 2015

Hemant Kumar Sahu S/o Gokul Ram Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Qwarter No. 99/ G Risali Sector Bhilai, Civil & Revenue Distt. Durg Chhattisgarh. No. 99/ G Risali Sector Bhilai, Civil & Revenue Distt. Durg Chhattisgarh.

--- Petitioner

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Lalbagh, Distt. Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh Lalbagh, Distt. Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh

--- Respondent

23.12.2015Mr. Awadh Tripathi, counsel for the applicant.Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Govt. Advocate.This is the first bail application filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code seeking grant of bail in connection with Crime No.328 of 2014 registered at P.S. Lalbagh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G), for the offence punishable u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471/34 IPC.As per the prosecution case, the applicant along-with other co-accused in order to provide job in different government departments has collected amounts to the tune of Rs. 82 lakhs and thereafter forged appointment letters were issued to the candidates and from the applicant forged seal of the Government departments were seized.Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicant has not been named in the FIR and no evidence is available against this applicant. He further submits that the applicant is in jail since 04.12.2015 and the witnesses have been examined, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.Per contra, learned State Counsel opposes the bail application. He further submits that the bail applications of similarly placed co-accused Tejesh Kumar has been dismissed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in M.Cr.C.No.582/2015 on 09.02.2015.Perused the case diary and the statements.Considering the nature of allegations against this applicant and the way in which the offence committed and further taking into the fact that the bail application of similarly placed co-accused has been rejected, I am not inclined to allow this bail petition. Accordingly, it is rejected.R a o Sd/-GOUTAM BHADURIJUDGE

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead