Gujarat High Court
MCACP/466/1994 of SARLABEN N MASHRUWALA Vs P K GHOSH on 22 November 1995
APPLICATION NO. 466 OF 1994. Date of decision: 22.11.1995 For approval and signature The Honourable Mr. Justice S.M. Soni and The Honourable Mr. Justice R.R. Jain Mr.B.R.Gupta & Mr.Sanjay Gupta, advocates for petitioner. Mr. S.N. Shalet, advocate for respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 466 OF 1994.
Date of decision: 22.11.1995
For approval and signature
The Honourable Mr. Justice S.M. Soni
and
The Honourable Mr. Justice R.R. Jain
Mr.B.R.Gupta & Mr.Sanjay Gupta, advocates for petitioner.
Mr. S.N. Shalet, advocate for respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of judgment?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
���Coram: S.M.Soni & R.R.Jain, JJ.
���-----------------------------
���November 22, 1995.
Oral judgment (Per Soni, J.)
This application is filed by the petitioner to take action under the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that respondents have not complied with the order of the Small Causes Court to refund certain amount. The petitioner has not produced that order of which breach is alleged. In absence of that prder. this court cannot decide whether there is any substance in the contention or not.
Hence this application deserves to be dismissed.
After this order is dictated, learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application so that he can make representation before the authority. Permission to withdraw the application is granted. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. No costs.