Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31227/2024 of SHAIK MOHAMMED RAFIQ Vs THE STATE OF AP on 31 December 2024
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER [o TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR ' -o' SI 7) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 31227 OF 2024 Between: Shaik Mohammed Rafiq, S/o. Shaik Gouse
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER [oTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR'PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDAWRIT PETITION NO: 31227 OF 2024
-o'SI7)'
Between:
Shaik Mohammed Rafiq, S/o. Shaik Gouse Moiden, Age 40 years,R/o.D.NO.30-64-A, Alimbad Street, Rayachoti Town, Annamayya[District.]
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur,[Guntur][ District.]Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur,[Guntur][ District.]
2. The District Collector, Annamayya District, Rayachoti.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub-Collector, Rayachoti[Revenue]Division, Rayachoti, Annamayya District.Division, Rayachoti, Annamayya District.
4. The Tahsildar, Sambepalle Mandal, Annamayya District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly onein thenature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the 4threspondentinactingupontheForm-6Aapplicationbearingno.RMU0122084419465 submitted by the petitioner on 03-03-2022., as illegal,arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 4th respondenttoconsidertheForm-6Aapplicationsubmittedbythepetitioneron03-03-2024., and pass orders in accordance with law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying thatin the[circumstances]stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the4**^ respondent to consider the Form-6A applicationbearingno.RMU0122084419465submittedbythepetitioneron03-03-2022.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. VENKATA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUEThe Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010597142024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI[3329](Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 31227/2024
Between:
Shaik Mohammed Rafiq and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Ap and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.G VENKATA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 31227/2024
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Instant Writ Petition under Article 226 of the[Constitution][ of]India is filed by the Petitioner for the following[relief;]
“..to issue a writ order or direction more particularly[in][ the][ nature][ of]writof Mandamus declaringtheinaction onthepartofthe4RespondentinactingupontheForm-6AapplicationbearingNo.RMUOt22084419465 submitted by the Petitioner on[03.03.2022,]as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently[direct][ the]4’^ Respondent to consider the Form-6A application[submitted][ by][ the]Petitioner on 03.03.2022 and pass..."
2. Thoughthepetitioner madeseveralallegationsagainsttherespondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the[petitioner][ requested]this Court, without touching the merits of the case,[to][ issue][ a][ direction][ to]the respondents to dispose of the representation dated[03.03.2022][ of][ the]Petitioner.
3. LearnedGovernmentPleaderforRevenuerepresentingRespondents readily agreedto dispose of the representationofthepetitioner dated 03.03.2022, if any pending with the[authorities.]
4. In viewof the submission of the learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Revenuethis Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of
the allegations made in the petition. This CourtiIS conscious that no suchdirection be issued,inview of the judgment of the Apex Court in “TheGovernment of IndiaV. P.Venkatesh*”, wherein the Apex Court heldthat suchordersmay make for a quick or easy disposal of casesioverburdened adjudicatory institutions.[n]But, they do no serviceto thecauseof justice.Asthelearnedcounselforthepetitionerhimselfrequested to issue a direction to dispose of therepresentationdated03.03.2022,I find no other alternativeexcept to issue such direction.
5. Intheresult,thewritpetitionisdisposedof,directingtherespondents to dispose of therepresentation dated 03.03.2022 of thePetitionerin accordance withlaw,if necessaryissuenoticetothestakeholdersif any including the Petitioner withinthe period of two (02)months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.petitionisdisposedof,directingtherespondents to dispose of therepresentation dated 03.03.2022 of thePetitionerin accordance withlaw,if necessaryissuenoticetothestakeholdersif any including the Petitioner withinthe period of two (02)months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications pendingif any, shall also stand closed.
2019 (8) SCALE 544
Sd/- M. SRINIVASASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SEQTJ;OFFICER
To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of A.P.,Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur, Guntur District.Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur, Guntur District.
2. The District Collector, Annamayya District, Rayachoti.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub-Collector, Rayachoti RevenueDivision, Rayachoti, Annamayya District.Division, Rayachoti, Annamayya District.
4. One CC to Sri G. Venkata Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Pradesh. [OUT]
6. Three CD Copies.
HIGH COURT
DATED:31/12/2024
ORDERWP.No.31227 of 2024
.g1 7 JAN 20?5Co'ICurrent Section
DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS