Andhra Pradesh High Court

CIVIL APPEAL 166 of 2008 on 5 December 2007

APHC010506752008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMAFAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 166/2008

Between:

1. SMT. RESAPU RAMALAKSHMI, W/O VENKATA SIVA HEMASUNDAR REDDY HOUSE WIFE R/O D.NO. 52-11-8, RESAPUVANIPALEM, VISAKHAPTNAM.REDDY HOUSE WIFE R/O D.NO. 52-11-8, RESAPUVANIPALEM, VISAKHAPTNAM.

...APPELLANT

AND

1. SRI RESAPU VENKATA SIVA HEMASUNDAR REDDY, S/o Seetharama Reddy R/o D.No. 52-11-8, Resapuvanipalem, Visakhapatnam.

...RESPONDENT

Appeal under section________ against ordersset aside the Decree and Order dated 5-12-2007 in OP.NO. 503 of 2005 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Visakhapatnam and consequently allow the appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 336 OF 2008

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 177 days in representing the above appeal in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 2 OF 2008(FCAMP 341 OF 2008

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Decree and Order dt. 05.12.2007 in O.P.503 of 2005 on the file of the Judge: Family Court at Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the Appeal Counsel for the Appellant:

1. N SURYA KUMARI

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. GODA RAMALAKSHMI

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

&

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.166 of 2008

JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

On 13.08.2025, when this matter was listed, there was no representation on either side. Accordingly, this matter was posted to 03.09.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 10.09.2025, this matter was again listed. On that day also, there was no representation on either side. To give one more opportunity to the parties, it was posted to today. Today also, there is no representation on either side. Hence, it appears that the parties have no interest to prosecute the appeal.

2. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________

JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

Date:24.09.2025

SCS

__________________________________

JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

&

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.166 of 2008

Dt.24.09.2025

SCS

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead