Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/7164/2015 of A. Prem Vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 23 December 2015
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 7164 of 2015 • A . Prem S/o A Vijay Aged About 25 Years R/o Behind Dena Bank Street No. 8, Sector No. 11, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through : Station House Officer, P.S. Chhawani Bhilai District Durg
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 7164 of 2015
A. Prem S/o A Vijay Aged About 25 Years R/o Behind Dena Bank Street No. 8, Sector No. 11, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh Street No. 8, Sector No. 11, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through : Station House Officer, P.S. Chhawani Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh --- Respondent Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh --- Respondent For the applicant:Mr. Anurag Jha, AdvocateFor the Respondent:Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel LawyerFor the Respondent:Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer :Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 23.12.2015
1. This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking grant of regular bail to the applicant in connection with Crime No. 655/2015 registered at P.S. Chhawani, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act.Criminal Procedure seeking grant of regular bail to the applicant in connection with Crime No. 655/2015 registered at P.S. Chhawani, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act.
2. The prosecution alleges that when a raid/inspection was conducted by the Police, 17.280 bulk litres of illicit liquor was seized from the possession of the applicant. conducted by the Police, 17.280 bulk litres of illicit liquor was seized from the possession of the applicant.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and no seizure was made from his possession. has been falsely implicated in this case and no seizure was made from his possession.
4. Per contra, learned State Counsel opposes the bail and submits that earlier the applicant was arrested for keeping 1.620 bulk litres of illicit liquor in Crime No.619/2015.submits that earlier the applicant was arrested for keeping 1.620 bulk litres of illicit liquor in Crime No.619/2015.
Page 1 of 2
5. Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances and and the quantity of seized liquor in this case is 17.280 bulk litres and its seizure is denied by the applicant; offence and and the quantity of seized liquor in this case is 17.280 bulk litres and its seizure is denied by the applicant; offence is triable by the JMFC and the applicant is in jail since 27.10.2015 and also considering the fact that on earlier occasion, the applicant was found to be in possession of only 1.620 litres this Court is inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, this application is allowed.
6. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court . He is directed to appear before the said Court as and when directed by the said Court.executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court . He is directed to appear before the said Court as and when directed by the said Court.
7. C.c. as per rules.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURIJUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…