WPS/7066/2008 of SMT. RUKHMANI SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and OTHERS on 19 December 2008

../^-hLF^i^.-?.<''',*<'-;^A."'°'%, s. f?""~^'i "^M ^^'^i^^

'S^ •^wm<i, gnlwis, Ta|cil<-f^'t

w^y; w -i1+wnsii^win?

'^^ '^wiw, y^y'iy, faMi'H^

«(p<ciFg»w%

s^t^V (.^y^)

-2q)l<ftt!ft^1'T tfP^f ^* 1^t€t>Xf^^iTiT3ffin<ffl%?t TOIW ^iter ailSsi testmionials for its verifica4on. She appeared on fhe given date, hertestuaonials were found ia (jirder after veri&cation.w^ However,•• thereafter,she has not jreceived any coquaunication regarcLuig her appomtinent,The[•pttitioner]hasfcready submitted her representation ofAnnexureP-*6,dated4.f.2008iuthisregard.However,herrepresentation'•^f^i- has also not Tjieeu decided tUl date.Leamed counsel for ft^e State submits that ia case the petitionerfiles a fresh represeutatioii fi[>r redressal of her gnevances, ralsed ui thiswrit petition, before the res^oadent No.3 along wifh copy of this order,within a period of one weekjfroin today, the same shall be consideredand decided within a furthi;r period of fhree weeks fi-om. fhe date ofrcceipt offhe representationjIn view of the above sjubnussion of leamed couiisel for the State,this petition is disposed of|yi£h. Uberty to the petitioner to file a freshrepresentation for redressa^ of her grievances before fhe respondentNo.3 aloag wifh a copy of thp.s order withia a week froia today. On suchrepresentation being laade,the same shaU be considered and decided•cordaaceby fhe respondent No.3 ia ai( wifh law on its own inerits withiaa furfher period of threeweeks from. fhe^ date of receipt pf fherepresentation.

DhirendraMishraJudge