Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5739/2022 of DILESHWARI KASHYAP Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 31 December 2022
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 5739 of 2022 1. Dileshwari Kashyap D/o Boti Kashyap Aged About 20 Years R/o Sadakpara, Chondimetawada, Singapur, District Bastar (C.G.) 494005 2. Kumari Aishwarya Sakni D/o Santi Aged About 18 Years R/o Belwa Para, Pedakodepal, Nemed, District Bijapur (C.G.),
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 5739 of 2022
1. Dileshwari Kashyap D/o Boti Kashyap Aged About 20 Years R/oSadakpara, Chondimetawada, Singapur, District Bastar (C.G.) 494005 Sadakpara, Chondimetawada, Singapur, District Bastar (C.G.) 494005
2. Kumari Aishwarya Sakni D/o Santi Aged About 18 Years R/o BelwaPara, Pedakodepal, Nemed, District Bijapur (C.G.), 494444 Para, Pedakodepal, Nemed, District Bijapur (C.G.), 494444
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health AndMedical Education, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, NavaRaipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Medical Education, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, NavaRaipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2. Nursing Council Of India Nbcc Center, Plot No. 2, Community Center,Okhla Phase-1, New Delhi-110020 Okhla Phase-1, New Delhi-110020
3. Director Medical Education Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar,New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
4. Chairman Vyapam (C.G. State), Nava Raipur, Sector-19, Rakhi-1,Chhattisgarh 492101 Chhattisgarh 492101
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Shri Himanshu Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Miss Priyamvada Singh, Deputy GA.For Respondent No.4 : Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J
Order On Board
31/12/2022
Page 1 of 2
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that videletter dated 29[th] December, 2022 issued by the State Governmentletter dated 29[th] December, 2022 issued by the State Government regarding admission in the B.Sc. (Nursing) Course for the year 2022-23,the State Government invoking powers vested in it under Rule 16 & 17of the Chhattisgarh Nursing Pathyakram Pravesh Niyam, 2019, hasreduced the percentile/percentage to the extent of ‘0’.
2. Learned State Counsel does not dispute the above fact and submits thatthe present petition has become infructuous.the present petition has become infructuous.
3. In the light of the subsequent development, the present petition isdisposed of.disposed of.
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Vacation Judge
Barve
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…