Chhattisgarh High Court

WPC/5739/2022 of DILESHWARI KASHYAP Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 31 December 2022

CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 5739 of 2022 1. Dileshwari Kashyap D/o Boti Kashyap Aged About 20 Years R/o Sadakpara, Chondimetawada, Singapur, District Bastar (C.G.) 494005 2. Kumari Aishwarya Sakni D/o Santi Aged About 18 Years R/o Belwa Para, Pedakodepal, Nemed, District Bijapur (C.G.),

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPC No. 5739 of 2022

1. Dileshwari Kashyap D/o Boti Kashyap Aged About 20 Years R/oSadakpara, Chondimetawada, Singapur, District Bastar (C.G.) 494005 Sadakpara, Chondimetawada, Singapur, District Bastar (C.G.) 494005

2. Kumari Aishwarya Sakni D/o Santi Aged About 18 Years R/o BelwaPara, Pedakodepal, Nemed, District Bijapur (C.G.), 494444 Para, Pedakodepal, Nemed, District Bijapur (C.G.), 494444

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health AndMedical Education, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, NavaRaipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Medical Education, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, NavaRaipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. Nursing Council Of India Nbcc Center, Plot No. 2, Community Center,Okhla Phase-1, New Delhi-110020 Okhla Phase-1, New Delhi-110020

3. Director Medical Education Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar,New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

4. Chairman Vyapam (C.G. State), Nava Raipur, Sector-19, Rakhi-1,Chhattisgarh 492101 Chhattisgarh 492101

---- Respondent

For Petitioner : Shri Himanshu Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Miss Priyamvada Singh, Deputy GA.For Respondent No.4 : Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J

Order On Board

31/12/2022

Page 1 of 2

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that videletter dated 29[th] December, 2022 issued by the State Governmentletter dated 29[th] December, 2022 issued by the State Government regarding admission in the B.Sc. (Nursing) Course for the year 2022-23,the State Government invoking powers vested in it under Rule 16 & 17of the Chhattisgarh Nursing Pathyakram Pravesh Niyam, 2019, hasreduced the percentile/percentage to the extent of ‘0’.

2. Learned State Counsel does not dispute the above fact and submits thatthe present petition has become infructuous.the present petition has become infructuous.

3. In the light of the subsequent development, the present petition isdisposed of.disposed of.

Sd/-

(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)

Vacation Judge

Barve

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead