Chhattisgarh High Court

WPCR/237/2014 of Satyendra Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. on 24 December 2014

COURT OF cHHATTIseARl-I AT BILAsPuR wm Petmon (Cr,) Ng 23% of 2014 ¢ PETITIQNER ‘Satyendra Slngh S/o Mamarak Smgh, Aged about 56 years, Occupation: Business, Proprietor and FL-3 License Holder of Hotel Aryan Bar and Lodge, Mohaila Choparapara, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh,

I_N THE HIGH COURT OF cHHATTIseARl-I AT BILAsPuRwm Petmon (Cr,) Ng 23%of 2014

¢‘Satyendra

PETITIQNER

SlnghS/o Mamarak Smgh,Aged about 56 years,Occupation: Business,Proprietor andFL-3LicenseHolderof Hotel Aryan Bar and Lodge,Mohaila Choparapara, Ambikapur,Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh,R/o Bouripara, Ambikapur,Police Station Ambikapur,Tahsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja,Chhattisgarh.

- Versus -

RESPONDENTS:

1. [/State]of Chhattisgarh,Through the Secretary,Department of Excise,Mantralaya,Mahanadi Bhawan,Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.Through the Secretary,Department of Excise,Mantralaya,Mahanadi Bhawan,Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. ~Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur,Distt.[Surguja,][ Chhattisgarh]Distt.[Surguja,][ Chhattisgarh]

3. Sub Divisional Magistrate,Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja,Chhamsgarh.Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja,Chhamsgarh.

4. Tahsildar, Ambikapur,Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

OhmWRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIAFORISSUANCE[l’OF]APPROPRIATEWRITNVRITSDIRECTIQN$ETC“INTHENATUREOFMANDAMUS,CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKENATURE

Thepetitioner,above named,most humbly andrespectfullybegs to submit as under:[-]

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR

Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

Writ Petition (Cr.) No.237 of 2014

PetitionerSatyendra Singh

Versus

Respondents

State of Chhattisgarh & Others

Page 1 of 2

Present:-ShriRajeevShrivastava,AdvocatewithShri Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Arun Sao, Deputy Advocate General for the State.

ORAL ORDER(Passed[on][ this][ 24th][ day]of December, 2014)

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

'

1. After hearinglearnedcounselfor thepetitioner[for][ sometime]'andin view of obtaining factualmatrix as also for the reason'andin view of obtaining factualmatrix as also for the reasonthattheimpugnedorderisinteriminnature,insteadofinterfering with the matter, the writ petitionis disposed of withliberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application beforetherevisionalCourtforearlierhearingoftherevision”4-application itself.interfering with the matter, the writ petitionis disposed of withliberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application beforetherevisionalCourtforearlierhearingoftherevision”4-application itself.

2..Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

3. Certified copy today.

Gowrl'

Sd/-

Prashant Kumar[Mishra]Judge

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead