Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/10308/2021 of MAHETTAR PATEL Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 30 December 2021
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 10308 of 2021 Mahettar Patel, aged about 52 years, Son of Hetram Patel, Caste Marar, R/o. Village Ganiyari, Police Station Urga, Tahsil Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) ---- Applicant Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the District Magistrate Korba [Excise
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No. 10308 of 2021
Mahettar Patel, aged about 52 years, Son of Hetram Patel, Caste Marar, R/o.Village Ganiyari, Police Station Urga, Tahsil Kartala, District Korba (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the District Magistrate Korba [Excise Circle Korba(South)], District Korba (C.G.)
----Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Mr. Siddharth Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.K. Chandravanshi
Order On Board
30-12-2021
(1) As per applicant, this is first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.preferred by the applicant before this Court and no other bail application is pendingbefore any other Court.
(2) The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 126/2021 registeredat Excise Circle Korba (South), District Korba (C.G.) for commission of offence punishableunder Sections 34(1)(A), 34(2) & 59(A) of C.G. Excise Act.
(3) Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant was found in possession of15 bulk liters of illicit liquor, which he was carrying without authority of law.
Page 1 of 2
(4) Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated inthe crime in question as no seizure has been made from him. He further submits that theapplicant is in detention since 17.12.2021 and the applicant is permanent resident ofDistrict Korba, therefore, there is no chance to influence the prosecution witnesses andabsconding of the accused/applicant and conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time, thus, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.
(5) Per contra, Counsel for the State opposes the bail application filed by theapplicant.
(6) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.
(7) Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, quantity of the liquorseized from the possession of the applicant and detention period of the applicant, I feelinclined to allow the bail application. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
(8) Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personalbond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of thetrial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given tohim by the said Court till disposal of the trial.
(9) In view of above, I.A. No. 01/2021 & I.A. No. 02/2021 stand disposed of.
Certified copy, as per rules.
Sd/-
(N.K.Chandravanshi) Vacation Judge
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…