Andhra Pradesh High Court
CIVIL APPEAL 96/2008 on 19 July 2000
APHC010606522008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMAFAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 96/2008
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MYLAPALLI ADINARAYANA, S/O. GURUVULU EMPLOYEE S.E. RAILWAY R/O. BOGGULA DIBBA, CANTONMENT, VIZIANAGARAMRAILWAY R/O. BOGGULA DIBBA, CANTONMENT, VIZIANAGARAM
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SMT MYLAPALLI VANI SRIVANI, W/o. Adinarayana Housewife R/o. Bhanojinagar, VisakhapatnamBhanojinagar, Visakhapatnam
...RESPONDENT
Appeal under section________ against ordersset aside the Judgment and decree dated 19.7.2000 in O.P.No.8 of 2003 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Visakhapatnam by allowing the FCA.
IA NO: 1 OF 2007(FCAMP 361 OF 2007
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 16 days in filing the FCA.
IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 86 OF 2008
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the decree and judgement dated 19.07.2007 in OP No.8 of 2003 [OP No.266 of 2002 Papur] on the file of Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2012(FCAMP 535 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim suspension Order granted by this Hon'ble Court in F.C.A. M.P. No. 86/2008 in F.C.A. No. 96/2008 dated 31.03.2008.
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P GOPALA KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. M SRINIVASA RAO
2. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.96 of 2008
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
During the course of hearing of this appeal today, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he has no instructions to prosecute this appeal further and hence, requested to close this appeal.
2. The statement of the learned counsel for the appellant is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date:24.09.2025 SCS
__________________________________
JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
&
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.96 of 2008
Dt.24.09.2025
SCS