Chhattisgarh High Court

WPS/5417/2011 of MAYARAM CHATURE and ANOTHER Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS. on 16 December 2011

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION (S) No. '5 Ll W OF 2011 / PETITIONERS: 1. Maya Ram Chautare S/o Shri Aghnu Ram Chautare, aged about 35 years, R/o. Village — Hathnikala, Tehsil — Pathariya, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Santosh Kumar Banjare S/o Shri. Krishna Das Banjare

1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR(CG)

WRIT PETITION (S) No.['5][ Ll]W

OF 2011

PETITIONERS:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. /

Maya Ram Chautare

S/o Shri Aghnu Ram Chautare, agedabout35R/o.Village—years,Hathnikala, Tehsil[—]Pathariya, Distt.Bilaspur (CG)

Santosh Kumar BanjareS/o Shri. Krishna Das Banjare agedabout26R/o.Nagaryears,Panchayat Bilha, Tehsil[—]Bilha, Distt.Bilaspur (CG)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS:

/

1. State of Chhattisgarh,

ThroughtheSecretary,ScheduleTribeandScheduleCasteDevelopmentDepartment,Mantralaya,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.)

2. Collector (Tribal Welfare)

Bilaspur (CG)

3. Assistant Commissioner,

TribalWelfare,OfficeoftheCollector, Bilaspur (CG)

6%

PETITION[UNDER][ ARTICLE][ 226][ OF][ THE][ CONSTITUTION][ OF]WRITSOFOFAPPROPRIATEINDIAFORISSUANCEMANDAMUS[AND][ CERTIORARI][ AND][ FOR][ OTHER][ SUITABLE]WRITSM[AND][ DIRECTIONS:-]

W”

z

y

:

HIGH COURT[OF][ CHHATTlsGARH][ AT][ BILASPUR](Hon.[Mr.][ Justice][ Pritinker][ Diwaker)]‘w.P.(5) No.[5417] orzon V

Maya Ram[Chutare][ &‘][ another]

VERSUS

State of Chhattisgarh[and][ others]

Respondents

""‘

Present:ShriJItendra[Pan][ counselforthe]petitionersShn Y S Thakur[Dy][A][ G][ forthe][ Statelrespondents]

O R D E R(16.12.2011)

5

Learned counsel[for][ the]petitioners[submits][ thatrhe:][ wants]to Withdraw this petition[with][ liberty][ to][ make][ a][ representation][ to»]respondent N02He further[submits][ that][ a][ direction][ may]hemIssuedto respondent No2to decide the[said]representationWithin sometime[frame.]

2. Learned State[counsel][ submits][ that][ till][ date,][ thepetitioners.])-have not made[any][ representation][ but]yet,[they][ are][ ciaiming]m[ ton]V1‘deciding their[representation.]

r;_

3. The petition dismissed[as][ withdrawn][ with][ iibeity’as][ prayed]for.itis expected[that]if any representationis made byvthelpetitioner[to][ respondent][ No.2,][ the][ same][ shall][ be][ dedded‘byhirrr]in accordance[With][ law][ as][ expeditiously][ as]possible._ 5

4. ltis made[clear][ that][ this][ Court][ has][ not‘rexpressed][ any]Lopinion[on][ the][ ments][ of][ the][ case][ and][ the][ authority][ concerned,»]wouidbeatlibertytodecidetherepresentationstrictlyin1accordance[With][ law.]wouidbeatlibertytodecidetherepresentationstrictlyin1accordance[With][ law.]

Sd/—

Pritinker DiwakerJudge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead