Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1354/2019 of BODAWADA COLD STORAGE Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 29 December 2023
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1354 OF 2019 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1354 OF 2019
Petitionunder Article 227of the Constitutionof India aggrieved by theorder dated 18.01.2018inI.A. No.874 of 2017 in O.S.No.212 of 2014 on the fileof the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Paruchur, Prakasam[District.]
Between:
Bodawada Cold Storage, Parchur, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Kakula SridharaRao,S/o Veeranjaneyulu,aged about 47 years.Cultivation,R/oBodawadaVillage, Parchur.
AND
...Petitioner/Petitioner
1.State Bank of India, Parchur, Rep. by its Branch Manager.
2.Karumanchi Ravi Babu, S/o. Veeraiah, R/o.Bidawadam,[Paruchur][ Mandal.]
(RR 2 Not Necessary)
...Respondents/Respondents
lA NO:1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the[circumstances][ stated]in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of allfurther proceedings in O.S.No.212 of 2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge,Parchur, pending disposal of the above C.R.P.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. Kavitha Gottipati Counsel for the Respondent No.1:Sri S. Satyanarayana Moorthy Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Not Necessary The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No, 1354 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the[Order]dated18.01.2018inl.A.No.874of 2017inO.S.No.212of2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Parchur.
2. Sri A.V.N. Yaswanth, learned counsel appearingon behalf of Smt. Kavitha Gottipati, learned counsel[for][ the]petitioner submits that the issue raised in the presentCivilRevisionPetitionhasbecomeinfructuousandnofurtherorders are necessarv.on behalf of Smt. Kavitha Gottipati, learned counsel[for][ the]petitioner submits that the issue raised in the presentCivilRevisionPetitionhasbecomeinfructuousandnofurtherorders are necessarv.
3. Recordingtheabovesaidsubmission,theCivilRevision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall beno order as to costs.Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall beno order as to costs.
As a sequel,all pending applications shall stand closed.
SD/- KJ. RAJA BABUASSISTANT REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. The Senior Civil Judge, Paruchur, Prakasam District(with[records][ if][ any)]
2. One CC to Smt.Kavitha Gottipati, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri S. Satyanarayana Moorthy, Advocate [OPUC]
4. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of[A.P][ at][ Amaravati.]5.Three CD Copies.5.Three CD Copies.
ssb
HIGH COURT
DATED:29/12/2023
ORDER
CRP.No.1354 of 2019
mI1« AP:^ 2:2'»ea/,^. Current Section
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
7 (jop<eApan