Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31921/2013 of Smt K. Sandhya, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, on 29 December 2023
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT Ho THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO * WRIT PETITION NO: 31921 OF 2013 Between: Smt. K. Sandhya, W/o C. Narendra Babu, Hindu, aged about 31
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
Ho*
WRIT PETITION NO: 31921 OF 2013
Between:
Smt.K. Sandhya, W/oC. Narendra Babu,Hindu, aged about 31years,R/oD.No.170, L. S. Nagar, Tirupati, Chittoor District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1.State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2.The Station House Officer, Tirupati Urban Police Station, Tirupati, ChittoorDistrictDistrict
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith, the High Court maybepleased to issue a writ order or directionin the nature of Mandamus declaringthe action of the 2"'' respondent in not following the procedure contemplatedinSection173Cr.P.Cin Crime.No.26of 2013Tirupati WomenPoliceStation,Tirupati UrbanDistrict,asillegal,improper,unjust,arbitrary andviolationofArticle 21 of Constitution of the India and consequently direct the 2nd respondenttofilereport as per Section173of Cr.P.Cin Crime No.26of 2013TirupatiWomen Police Station, Tirupati Urban District as early as possible preferably within a period of six weeks.
I.A. NO:1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 39670 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the[circumstances][ stated]in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleaseddirect the 2"'' respondent to file report as per Section173of Cr.P.Cin CrimeNo.26 of 2013 Tirupati Women Police Station, Tirupati Urban District as early aspossible preferably with in a period of six weeks pending writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAOW.P.No.31921 of 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER: -
Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala,learned counsel for thepetitioner, submits that the causeinthe present WritPetition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
2. Learned Government Pleader for Home appearing forthe respondents is present.the respondents is present.
3. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition isdismissed as Infructuous.dismissed as Infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending,if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABUASSISTANT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTIOr^OFFICER
To,
1. One CC to Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala, Advocate [OPUC]2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]3.Three CD Copies.ssbglMay HIGH COURT
DATED:29/12/2023
ORDERWP.No.31921 of 2013
s:CJio2 2 MAY 202^m-<1Current Section
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS
p^b^aMJ20