Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6166/2023 of RATNAMMA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 31 December 2024
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 6166/2023 Between: Ratnamma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State
APHC010121982023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAOWRIT PETITION NO: 6166/2023
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
Ratnamma and Others
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM
PANCHAYAT
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
The Court made the following order:-
The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the properties situated in an extent of Ac.02-77 cents in Sy.No.1469, Ac.01-29 cents in Sy.No.1335/2, Ac.02-50 cents in Sy.No.1517 and Ac.03-00 cents in Sy.No.1517, at Bagalnaatham Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners addressed a letter dated 28.12.2024 to the Registrar (Judicial) alluding that the respondent authorities have given assurance that they will not dispossess the petitioners from the subject properties and sought to list the matter under the caption ‘for withdrawal’.
3. Accordingly, the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for withdrawal’. Learned counsel for the petitioners also sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. Learned counsel made an endorsement on the bundle to that extent.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.6166 of 2023 Date: 31.12.2024
KBN