Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1331/2019 of BODAWADA GCLD STORAGE Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 29 December 2023
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT^^ FRIDAY , THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE in d; PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1331 OF 2019 Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated
CO/7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT^^
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
ind;
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1331 OF 2019
Petitionunder Article 227of ConstitutionofIndia aggrievedby the order dated18/01/2018 in lA No.818 of 2017 in O S No.208/2014 on the file of the Court of theSenior Civil Judge, Parchuru, Prakasam District.
A'*
Between;
1.Bodawada Cold Storage, Rep. by its Managing Partner[Kakula][ Sridhara][ Rao]s/o Veeranjaneyulu aged about 47 years, cultivationr/o Bodawada village,Parchur.s/o Veeranjaneyulu aged about 47 years, cultivationr/o Bodawada village,Parchur.
AND
...PETITIONER/PETITIONER
1.State Bank Of India, rep. by its Branch Manager.
2.Bhimaneni Bullaiah, s/o Satyanarayana, r/o Adusumalli village, ParchurMandal.Mandal.
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
lA NO:1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the[circumstances][ stated][ in]the affidavit filedin support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased togrant stay of all further proceedingsin O.S.No. 208of 2014 on thefile of theSenior Civil Judge, Parchur, pending disposal of the above C.R.P.,in the interestof justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1331 of 2019
ORDER;
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the[Order]dated18.01.2018inI.A.No.818of 2017inO.S.No.208of2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Parchur.
2.Sri A.V.N.Yaswanth,learned counsel appearingon behalf of Smt. Kavitha Gottipati, learned counselfor thepetitioner submits that the issue raised in the presentCivilRevisionPetitionhasbecomeinfructuousandnofurtherorders are necessary.on behalf of Smt. Kavitha Gottipati, learned counselfor thepetitioner submits that the issue raised in the presentCivilRevisionPetitionhasbecomeinfructuousandnofurtherorders are necessary.
3.Recordingtheabovesaidsubmission,theCivilRevision Petitionis dismissed as infructuous. There shall beRevision Petitionis dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel,all pending applicationsshall stand closed.
S/d-U. SRI DEVIASSISTANT REGISTRARCTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1.The Senior Civil Judge, Parchuru.Prakasam District.
2.One CC toSRI. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Advocate [OPUC]
3.One CC to SRI. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Advocate [OPUC]
4.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra[Pradesh][ at]Amaravathi.Amaravathi.
5.Three CD Copies
AL
HIGH COURT
VDATED:29/12/2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CRP.No.1331 of 2019
^ GsipfeOFoS^f^l2-l2-Lf-lio1!^cmm06 L^0 4 MAY 202A<59^ Current Seotion DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS