WPS/7604/2007 of SHUKLA DEY and 4 ORS. Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS. on 20 December 2007

1. Smt. Shukla Dey, aged 38 ycarsW/o Mr. Sudip Day, Upper DivisionTeacher,GovemineBtHr.Sec.School, Dcwada, P&tan, Distt.Durg.2.Smt, R. Sreelatha, Aged 39 yearsW/o Mr. B. Ajay Kuinar, 1-^ctiirer,GovenxmeutHr.Scc.Scltool,Dewada, Pataa District Durg C.G.3.Siut. Kirti Pradhaa, aged 38 yearsW/o Mr. Ajay PTadhan, I^ecturer,GovenunentHr.Sec.School,Dewada, Patan District Dui^ C.G.4.Sm.t. Sangeeta Singh Baghel, Aged42 years, W/o Mr. Pravas SiaghBaghel, Lecturer, Govemrnent Hr.Sec.School,Dewada.PatanDistrict Durg C.G.5.Sint Noorussaba Shariff, aged 51W/o J.M,Sbariff,Head-years,Mistress,Govenuaeat?»!iddkSchool,Ctibawni,BliilaiDistt.Dui^

PETITIONBRS

Versus

RESPONDENTS

1. TheStateGoveminentofChbattisgarb,ThroughfheSecretaiy,Education&TribalDepartment,D.K.S.Bhavan,Raipur (C,G.)2.AssistaatCoiainissioneT.TribalWeMare Departinent Rajnandgaon(C.G.)3.TheDistrictEducationOfficer,Durg (C.G.)4.DirectorofPiibUcInstnicfionRaipiir (C.G.)

WRIT PETITIOM UBroBR_ARTICLE 886 OF THE COBSTITUTIONOFLIKTOA

Appearance:

Shri Soinkant Verma, connsel for the petitioTiers.Shri Pradcep Singh, Panel I^awyer for fhe State on advancecopy.

WPfSI No. 7604/2007

QRAL ORDER

(20.12.2007$

SUIHL KUMAR 8INHA, J

Heard on admission.

Leamedcounselforthepetitionerssubmitsthat thepetitioners have passed B.Ed. exainination on their own expenses,t.herefore, they are entMert to receive two advance increinentsaccordmg to circiilars date.d 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. HR a1sosubinits that in many identical insttei's, the petitions have becnallowed in terms of the order passed in the case of YeishwantKwnar Bharadutaf Vs.SSunlcifMl Corpnratlon,flurgeuidanother ^2006 ffl? J UR-CG 96^. He submits that the case offhepetitioners is squarely covered by the said judginent.This legal position is not disputed t>y the leamed coiinsel forfhe State. However, he suhtnits that tlie oixler may he passed intenns of the said jiidginent, but it shall be siAject to vp.rificationw-garding petitionei-s' siich quatification.

Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in tei-ms of tlieonder passed in case of Vashiiieinl Kumar Bh.a.radwaj Vs. MunidpalCorporation, Diirg and anaiher (Supra) sohy.ct to verification of the.factsastowhetherthepetitioncrRhadacqiiiredB.Ed.Exaininatibn Certificates on fheir own expcnses as per circularsdated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1.999 and further whether they havebeen paid two advance increiaents or not.

The petition stands fina11y disposed of. No order as to costs.