Gujarat High Court

SCA/6942/1996 of GUJARAT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Vs M/S. AVANI DYE CHEM on 14 December 1999

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6942 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Sd/- Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6942 of 1996

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Sd/- Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

Versus

M/S. AVANI DYE CHEM -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: SUO MOTU for Petitioner MR BY MANKAD AGP for Respondent No. 1

-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA

Date of decision: 14/12/1999

ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per R.K.Abichandani, J.)

��When this matter is called out, the

learned counsel appearing for the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB), who appears before us, states that the GPCB will follow the instructions already given by the Court in similar suo moto petitions, more particularly in Special Civil Application No.10524 of 1998 decided on 1.9.1999, Special Civil Application No.514 of 1999 decided on 7.9.1999 and Special Civil Application No.9033 of 1998 decided on 9.9.1999. Accordingly, the GPCB will take action under the law if there is any default committed by the units concerned. In this view of the matter, no further action is required to be taken by this Court. Rule is therefore discharged with no order as to costs.

2. We make it clear that the units concerned will not be able to operate without obtaining the requisite consent of the Board.

���Sd/-

��� ( R.K.Abichandani, J.)

Sd/-

��� ( D.H.Waghela,J.)

(KMG Thilake)

#####

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead