Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2001/2018 of VEMPATI SANDEEP Vs VEMPATI SIROMANI on 29 December 2023
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2001 OF 2018 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the learned
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2001 OF 2018
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking adirectiontothelearnedPrincipalDistrict Judge,KrishnaDistrictatMachilipatnam to dispose of the IDOP No. 261/2017.
Between:Vempati Sandeep, S/o. Simon,aged 26 years,R/o. Door. No. 5/84-11-8, Gudivada,Krishna District.
...Petitioner
AND
Vempati Siromani, W/o Sandeep,D/o. Abbadasari Venkateswara Rao,aged about 21 years, Occ: HousewifeR/o. Harijanawada Kotapadu Post,Chatrai Mandal, Krishna District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
...Respondent
Petition under Section 151 CPC, praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the Hon'ble Principal District Judge Krishna District atMachilipatnam for expedite disposal of the IDOP No. 261/2017 preferablywithin two months from the date of the order in the above CRPintheinterest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA
The Court made the following Order:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAYCIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2001 of 2Q1«
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking expeditiousdisposal of I.D.O.P.No.261 of 2017, within two months from thedate of the order of this Court.It is to be noted that in the absenceof any order under challenge this Civil Revision Petition is per se isnot maintainable.
2. Evenotherwise,noexceptionalreasonshavebeenexplained in seeking such a direction to enable this Court to passsuch direction.noexceptionalreasonshavebeenexplained in seeking such a direction to enable this Court to passsuch direction.
3. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No orderas to costs.as to costs.
As a sequel,the miscellaneouspetitionsif any shall standdismissed.
SDI- M PRABHAKAR RAOASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
oPrincipal District Judge, Krishna District, at Machilipatnam.?■^Yallabandi Ramatirtha, Advocate. [OPUC3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi4. Three CD Copies.
LRVsree
HIGH COURT
DATED:29/12/2023
ORDER
CRP.No.2001 of 2018
G copfts2g 2.\ZI+
D5l
DISMISSING THE C.R.P.WITHOUT COSTS
5 °'Voor-hX^\t5.CutTen(S®^;;S-J:=='!r^-rCX