Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/32369/2015 of Hari Om Spiritual & Service Society, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary on 31 December 2024
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR , PRESENT ' THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 32369 OF 2015 Between: Hari Om Spiritual & Service Society, Regd.No.31/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURPRESENTTHE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAOWRIT PETITION NO: 32369 OF 2015
'
Between:
Hari OmSpiritual & ServiceSociety,Regd.No.31/2012Rep.byitsPresident Kandula Sreenivasulu Reddy s/o Late K.VenkataReddy, aged43 years r/o #6/465-3C, Shankarapuram, Kadapa.
...PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue(Endts.ll) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.(Endts.ll) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioiner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad.
3. Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanrams, Tirupati, Chittoor District,Rep. by itsExecutive OfficerExecutive Officer
4. The Regional Joint Commissioner, Tirupati, Chittoor District
5. Sri Veeranjaneyaswamy Temple Rep. by its. Executive Officer,GrandyChakrayapet Mandal, Kadapa District.Chakrayapet Mandal, Kadapa District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmaybe pleasedto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction,moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusto declare the orderspassed in G.O.Ms.No. 1995 Revenue (Endts.ll) Departmentdt. 19.11.2011of the 1st respondent and theconsequently proceedings bearing Roc.No.TS5/13745/2015 dt. 26-9-2015 issued by the 3rd respondent asbeingIllegal, arbitrary, without any reason and without following the procedure .r/•4
and consequently setcontemplated under the Law, is illegal and arbitraryaside the same.
I A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 41826 OF 20151
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesof the writ petition, the High Courtstated in the affidavit filed in supportof all further proceedings pursuant to themay be pleased to grant stay.NO.TS5/13745/2015 dt.26.09.2015 issued byimpugned Proceedings Roc.the 3rdrespondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s KAVITHA GOTTIPATICounsel for theRespondents No.1,2; GP FOR ENDOWMENTSCounsel for the Respondents: SUNDARI R PISUPATIcounsel for the Respondents No.3,4: SRI A PRABHAKAR[SARMA][ (SC]
FOR TTD)
counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI G RAMANA RAO (SCFORENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION)
The Court made the following: ORDER
S-ANDHRA PRADESHAPHC010780782015INthe high courtat ANIARAVATI ofJurisdiction)(Special Origin^' -thirty first day of DECEMBERTUESDAY ,THEand TWENTY FOURTWO THOUSANDpresentK WIANNIADHA RAOTHEhonourable dr justiceWR!IPEI!I!ONNOlB269a015
[3310]
•
Between;...petitionerHari OmSpiritual & Service SocietyAND...rESPONDENT(S)Rep By Its PrincipalOf Andhra PradeshThe StateSecretary and OthersCounsel for the Petitioner;1.KAVITHA GOTTIPATIthe Respondent(S);Counsel forSARMA SC FOR TTD1 .A PRABHAKAR2.SUNDARiRPISUPATIrAYALASEEMAREGION)for endowments3.GRAMANA RAO (SCendowments (AP)4.GP FORThecourt made the following; ORDER.for hearing, Ms.B.Nirupama,the matteris taken upToday, wheni, learned counsel for theMrs.Kavitha Gottipaticounsel, representinglearned petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive andithas become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petitionisdismissedasinfructuous. No order as to costs.infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications,if any pending,shall standsclosed.
SOI- SHAIK MOHD. RAFIASSISTANT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. One CC to SRI KAVITHA GOTTIPATI, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, High Court of Andhra[Pradesh][OUT][OUT]
3. One CC to SRI SUNDARI R PISUPATI, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRI A. PRABHAKAR SARMA, Advocate (SC FOR TTD)[OPUC][OPUC]
5. One CC to SRI G. RAMANA RAO, Advocate (SC FOR ENDOWMENTSRAYALASEEMAREGION) [OPUC]RAYALASEEMAREGION) [OPUC]
6. Three C.D. Copies
nm
HIGH COURTDATED:31/12/2024
ORDERWP.No.32369of2015
I"13 MAR 2025 S^ . Current ctecuon
DISMISING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS