Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9985/2017 of VIJAY KUMAR @ SEVAN VIJI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 28 December 2017
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.9985/2017 BETWEEN Vijay Kumar @ Sevan Viji S/o.Late Puttaswamy Aged about 34 years. R/at Kannahalli Village, Kannahalli Post, Mandya Taluk Mandya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28[th]DAY OF DECEMBER 2701/7
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9985/2017
BEIWEEN
Vijay Kumar @ Sevan VijiS/o.Late Puttaswamy|Aged about 34 years.R/at Kannanalli Village,Kannanalli Post, Manaya TalukManaya District-571436PETITIONER|(By Sri Ram Singn.K., Advocate)ANDState of KarnatakaBy Channapatna East Police Station, Ramanagara District, Represented by: Government Pieader,High Court of Karnataka,Bengaluru 560001 —.RESPONDENT
(By Sri K.Nagesnwarappa, HCGP)
Tnis Criminal Petition is filed Under section 438 Cr.PC.praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his.arrest in Cr.No.24/2017 of Channapatna East Police Station,Ramanagar District, and in C.C.No.772/2017 pending on the file|of I Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna for the.offence punishable under Section 143, 147, 148, 120(B) and.307 read witn Section 149 of IPC.|
Tnis Criminal Petition coming on for Orders this day, theCourt made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The substance of the complaint is that one year prior to'the filing of tne complaint, there was galata between the)complainant's brother Chandana @ Chandu and Dhruva and Nis|supporters. In that connection, at about 5.45 p.m. when the)complainant's brother Chandana was proceeding along with Nis|friends at Satanur Road, Dhruva and his supporters came in a.car armed with deadly weapons and committed the murder of Chandana. The case is registered for the offence punishable.under Sections 143, 14/7, 148, 120-B, 302 read with Section149 of IPC. Hence, the present petition by the petitionerseeking anticipatory bail.
2 |The context and nature of allegation suggests that|
this is nota fit case wnerein discretion could be exercised.
3Hence, the petition is dismissed.
*alD/-.
Sd/-'JUDGE