Gujarat High Court
AO/518/1992 of GANPATBHAI CHHANABHAI TANDEL Vs BABUBHAI BUDHABHAI PATEL on 18 December 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 518 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 518 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- GANPATBHAI CHHANABHAI TANDELVersus BABUBHAI BUDHABHAI PATEL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PV NANAVATI for Appellants MR JB PARDIWALA for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 18/12/98
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. As a result of the hearing and discussion, a consensus has been arrived at between the learned counsel, on the basis of which following directions are given : (1) The trial court shall hear and dispose of the pending of the Suit namely Spl.Civil Suit No.110/92 as expeditiously as possible and in any case, not later than 30th May, 1999.
No.110/92 as expeditiously as possible and in any It is clarified that until the Suit is disposed of, the orders passed by this Court in C.A.No.4760/92
shall continue to operate.
In view of the aforesaid directions, learned counsel for the appellants does not press this appeal for any further reliefs and the same is accordingly disposed of with no order asto costs.
Registry is directed to send a yadi to the trial court forthwith that is to say not later than 24th December, 1998. Direct service is also permitted.
court forthwith that is to say not later than 24th mim/-