Andhra Pradesh High Court
WRIT PETITION 2 of 2019 on 27 December 2017
#
[-33Sf]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRAPRADESH(Special Original Jurisdiction)(Special Original Jurisdiction)
:: AMA|?AVATI
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTHDAY OF APRITWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
the honourable dr justice
VENKATA JYOTHIRMA! PRATAP/T^
WRIT PETITION NO: 4f;nfi r>c
Between:
P. Chandra S^har, S/o.Late P Chalamaiah.Agedabout51Years,Superientenden.,Presently, workingat Sri VenkateswaraSwamyTemple, Dwaraka Tirumala R/oFlat No.201, Garuda Crush ApartmentsGunadala, Vijayawada -PETITIONER
AND
(E^ndr^'* P^P'^hra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary (Revenue)ndowments). Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Guntur Districtndowments). Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Guntur District GnilEndowments, Government of Andhra PradeshGollapudi, Vijayawada. Krishna District.Gollapudi, Vijayawada. Krishna District.
3. Sri Durga Malieswara Swamy DevasthanamIndrakeeladri, VijayawadaIndrakeeladri, VijayawadaRep.by its Executive officer
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of IndiaIthatin theciIS filed prayingcircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewithJ. the High Court may be pleased issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyonein the nature of Writ of Mandamus, deolaring the initiation of second enquiryand the 2nd show cause notice RC.No.A1/4426/2017, dated 27.12.2017 bythe 3rd respondent against the petitioner inspite of the very same chargesalreadydroppedbythe3rdRespondentinProceedingsinRCNO.A1/3372/2016,dated02.04.2017asbad,illegal,arbitrary,withoutjurisdiction, set aside the samer
b) By further declaring that the petitioner is entitled to be promotedasAssistant Executive officer in 3rd Respondent institutioniin the existingvacancies as per the with all consequential service benefits attached to thepost with effecUrom 26.10.2018 when thevacancy has fallen.
lA NO: 1 OF ?niQ
PetitionunderSection151CPCisfiledprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the affidavit filediin support of the petition, the HighCourt may be pleased to direct th^'Respondent No.3, to consider the caseof petitioner and promote himas Assistant Executive Officer in the 3rdRespondent institution without reference to the pendency of enquiry in termspf show cause notice in RC.No.Al/4426/2017, dated 27.12.2017.lA NO: 2 OF 2019
PetitionunderSection151,CPCisfiledprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the affidavit filediin support of the petition, the HighCourt may be pleased to stay all furtherproceedings in pursuance to theshow cause notice No.A/2?l6- dt:27.12.2017 of the Executive Officer of the3rd Respondent institutfon issued to the petitioner.Counsel for the Petitioner(s)rSRI. t S RAYALU
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS(AP)Counsel for the Respondents: ^Rl KAPPERA KOTESWARARAO, SCFOR ENDOWMENTSThe Court made the following:
APHC010101312019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3396]
MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPAWRIT PETITION NO: 4506/2019
Between:
P. Chandra Sekhar,
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.TS RAYALU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1 .GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)
2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petitionis filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly[one][ in][ the][ nature][ of]WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the initiation of second enquiry and the 2"'^showcausenoticeRC.No.A1/4426/2017,dated27.12.2017bytherespondent against the petitioner inspite of the very same charges alreadydropped by the 3"^ Respondent in Proceedings in RC.NO.A1/3372/20 16, dated02.04.2017 as bad, illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, set aside the same, b)
By further declaring that the petitioner is entitled to be promoted as Assistantfhewithlif""^'if "" ^institution in the existing vacancieseffect[as per] fromrfde^a//en, c) and pass such other order or
2. SriKapperaKoteswaraRaolearnedStandingCounselforEndowments, appearing for the 3'“' respondent temple, would submit that thepetitioner was promoted.Copy of the proceedingsisplacedonrecord.Learned counsel would submit that no further orders are requiredin thismatter as the relief has become infructuous.learnedStandingCounselforEndowments, appearing for the 3'“' respondent temple, would submit that thepetitioner was promoted.Copy of the proceedingsisplacedonrecord.Learned counsel would submit that no further orders are requiredin thismatter as the relief has become infructuous.
3. None represented for the petitioner.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petitionis disposedof.There shall be no order as to costs.is disposedof.There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending,if any, shall standclosed.
SD/- V.DIWAKARDEPUTY REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER, high court DATED;28/04/2025
ORDER
m%2 6 SEP 202509,
WP.No.4506 of 2019
the wr/t petitionIS DISPOSED OF WITHOUTCOSTS
jr