Gujarat High Court
ITR/6/1984 of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs SHIRISHCHANDRA R DESAI on 3 December 1996
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 6 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 6 of 1984
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA.
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Versus SHIRISHCHANDRA R DESAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner
SERVED BY RPAD for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and — MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA.
— Date of decision: 03/12/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per R.K. Abichandani, J)
1. The following two questions have been referred to the Court for its opinion under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act:
1. "Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that, the
assessee did not derive any perquisite as a result of using the car for personal use and therefore the value thereof could not be added to the income of the assessee?"
2. "Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal
was right in law in coming to the
conclusion that, the assessee was
entitled to the full standard deduction
under Section 16(1) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961?"
2. The questions are directly covered by the decision of this Court in Income Tax Reference No. 266
of 1982 decided on 9.11.1995 in which my Esteemed Brother speaking for the Bench put the proposition very tersely that no personal benefit was offered to the assessee by providing the car when for its personal use recovery of expenses was made from the assessee. In this view of the matter, both the questions are answered in the affirmative and against the revenue. The reference stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
***