Gujarat High Court
SCA/11132/1994 of SHANTILAL B PARMAR Vs SWAMI NARAYAN MANDIR on 27 September 1995
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 11132 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 11132 of 1994
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- SHANTILAL B PARMARVersus SWAMI NARAYAN MANDIR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RV DESAI for Petitioner MR SN SHELAT for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT
Date of decision: 27/09/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Learned advocate Mr Anjaria for learned advocate Mr S.N.Shelat for the respondent Swami Narayan Mandir Trust states at the Bar that pursuant to the written instruction, upon request of the petitioner, the Trust is ready to take back the petitioner in service without backwages. The petitioner who is present in court states that he is ready to withdraw this petition unconditionally provided he is taken up in service without backwages. The petitioner had applied for settlement to the Trust by giving an application in writing which was considered by the Committee of the respondent Trust and after the decision, the aforesaid statement is made. The petitioner who is present in Court states that he would like to resume duty today. The other side has no objection. Therefore, he would be treated to have resumed duty from today.
In the circumstances, permission to withdraw the petition unconditionally is granted. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. The correspondence between the parties and the written instruction given to the advocate by the respondent Trust are placed on record. Rule discharged.
......