Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/1922/2010 of M/s. Balaji Breeding and Research Farms, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 December 2023

COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1922 OF 2010 Between: M/s. Balaji Breeding and Research Farms, Rep by its Partner Dr D Ramamoorthy, S/o.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1922 OF 2010

Between:M/s.BalajiBreeding and Research Farms, Rep byitsPartnerDrDRamamoorthy,S/o.M.GangadharamNaidu,agedabout 55 yelrsOcc-Business, R/o. H.No. 22, Varadarajapaeta Main Road, Kodambakam,^

...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused

AND

^Court o/I°P ^m!rdrrabad'''Prosecutor, High S/o'^M''^o^’^rtirnad Rahimuddin Ahmed,vSlom R^rChittorDislrir^'tillage, Reddigunta[Post,]vSlom R^rChittorDislrir^'tillage, Reddigunta[Post,]

...Respondent

Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.PC prayingthatintheaffidavit filedin support of the Criminal RevisionRevkin^Court may be pleased to present the Memorandum[of][ Criminal]Revision case against the Judgment dt.22.07.2010 in CrI.A.No. 217 of 2004onbv^he Vth(FTC), Chittoor, as confirmeddM^9 0^20M ^’ Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chittoor[in][ CC.No.][ 32][ of][ 2002]

LA. NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP. NO: 2841 OF 20101

stated'P® circumstancesnklJlHaffidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bed 27 07 001sentenceof imprisonment maLin Judgmentfprci” rhrt on'" '^h*''® '''®'P®Sessions Judgedn9 08 2004 in"1® conviction vide Judgmentdt. 19.08.2004 in CC.No. 32 of 2002 on the file of Vth Addl. Judicial First ClassabovfctminaTRScal?"™'P®

StoM'^Wazelflaid'7^3"Rahimuddin Ahmed,Vellore R^d Chittoof 0^3,riot'tillage, Reddigunta[Post,]

...Petitioner, Respondent No.2Kodamba'kam,CI?ennai.'''^°'VaradarajapaetaMafnrS;

...Appellent / Respondent No.1 / Accusedits Public Prosecutor,[High]its Public Prosecutor,[High]

Page 1 of 3

Jourt of'A.°P.^"''^;d^rabad,'’'

...Respondent No.2

stated':rt%;idtif“i^lluVpLrt'^^fth^Of^pmninterim orders granted on 22-10-2010 in^ CrI R C f^o^284?of 2010 in Crl.R.C. No.1922 of 2010 and dismiss the crI R c nS 1922 of 2010^Jud"g;™FT?f C^To!"VII Addl. Sesl^on^

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. R CHANDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. M VENKATA RAMANAREDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1922 of 2010

ThisCriminalRevisionCaseISfiledbythepetitioner/accused against the judgment dated22.07.2010,inCrl.A.No.217 of 2004 passed by the VIII AdditionalSessions Judge(FTC) of Chittoor, confirming the judgment dated19.08.2004, inC.C.No.32 of 2002 of the V Additional JudicialMagistrate of FirstClass, Chittoor.petitioner/accused against the judgment dated22.07.2010,inCrl.A.No.217 of 2004 passed by the VIII AdditionalSessions Judge(FTC) of Chittoor, confirming the judgment dated19.08.2004, inC.C.No.32 of 2002 of the V Additional JudicialMagistrate of FirstClass, Chittoor.

2. Both the learned counselare present.are present.

3. Sri R. Chandra Reddy, learnedcounselfor the petitionerfileddeathcertificateofthepetitionerbynameSriDr.Ramamoorthy. M, said to be diedon 12.12.2011 and proof of thesame is filed and thesame is recorded.counselfor the petitionerfileddeathcertificateofthepetitionerbynameSriDr.Ramamoorthy. M, said to be diedon 12.12.2011 and proof of thesame is filed and thesame is recorded.

4. In view of the abovecicircumstances, the Criminal RevisionCase is dismissed as abated.circumstances, the Criminal RevisionCase is dismissed as abated.

Page 2 of 3

5. Asasequel,miscellaneousapplications pending,ifany,shall stand closed.Interim Orders granted earlier ifany, standvacated.applications pending,ifany,shall stand closed.Interim Orders granted earlier ifany, standvacated.

Sd/- M RAMESH BABUDEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

•DSECTION OFFICER

To,

1. The VII Addl. Sessions Judge, (FTC), Chittoor.

2. The Vth Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chittoor

3. One CC to Sri. R. Chandra Reddy Advocate [OPUC]

4. One CC to Sri. M.Venkata Ramana Reddy Advocate [OPUC]

^ [OUT^^^Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.

6. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh atAmaravati.7.Three CD Copies SVRvna HIGH COURT

DATED:29/12/2023

ORDERCRLRC.No.1922 of 2010

^c.ou^,^cp>j'

DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS ABATED

^ Co?v^

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead