Andhra Pradesh High Court
SA/1466/2011 of Bikkina Anantha Lakshmi Satyavathi Devi Vs Yaramati Rama Krishna on 29 December 2023
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY. THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B SYAMSUNDER SECOND APPEAL No.1466 of 2011 Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and decree dated 3-8-2011 in AS No. 307 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY. THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B SYAMSUNDER
SECOND APPEAL No.1466 of 2011
Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and decreedated 3-8-2011in AS No. 307 of 2009 on the file of IV Additional District Judge,Kakinada, East Godavari District and also the judgment[and][ decree][ dated][ 15-10-]2009 of theI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinadain OS No. 65 of 2007 anddecree the appeal as prayed for in the lower court.
Between:
Bikkina Anantha Lakshmi Satyavathi Devi, W/o. Venkata Madhusudhana Rao,aged 50 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Sivakadu Village, Razolu Mandal, EastGodavari District.
...Appellant/Defendant
AND
Yaramati Rama Krishna, S/o. Ramakrishnayya, aged 55 years, Occ:Cultivation, R/o. Velangi, Karapa Mandal, East Godavari[District.]
...Respondent/Plaintiff
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Murli Narayan Bung (not present)Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Chandra Sekar, representing on Sri Chandra Sekar, representing on Chandra Sekar, representing on Sekar, representing on representing on on behalf of : Sri Chandra Sekar, representing on Sri Chandra Sekar, representing on Chandra Sekar, representing on Sekar, representing on representing on on behalf ofSri Marri Venkata Ramana The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BANDARU SYAMSUNDERSECOND APPEAL NO. 1466 OF 2011
^r,/■gmeiit■Mm>.-x.- ^representationfortheappellant thoughthe-Wr -a* matterlistedunderthecaptionofdismissaV’:Mr.i'-.B.cKandrashekar,learnedcounselrepresentedonbehalfofMr.Marri Venkata Ramana, learned counsel for the respondent.
Page 1 of 2
As there is no representation for the appellant though[the]matterislisted under thecaptionof“dismissal”,thisSecondAppeal is dismissed for default, with costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions,if any,shallstandclosed. The interim stay granted if any, shall stand[vacated.]
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
SECOND APPEAL No.1466 of 2011
Rs.
Ps.Rs. 5.00
Stamps for VakalatnamaAdvocate's fee on Rupees (FC not filed)
Total
Rs 5-00
(The respondents/claimants are entitled to costs of[Rs.5/-] (Rupees[ Five][ only)][ to] bepaid by the appellant)
Sd/- V. DIWAKARDEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
1. The IV Additional District Judge, Kakinada, East[Godavari][ District,][ (with] records[ If]any)any)
2. TheI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, East[Godavari][ District.]
3. One CC to Sri Murli Narayan Bung, Advocate [OPUC
4. One CC to Sri Marri Venkata Ramana, Advocate [OPUC]5.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra[Pradesh][ at][ Amaravathi.][ (to]dispatch the lower court records)5.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra[Pradesh][ at][ Amaravathi.][ (to]dispatch the lower court records)
6. THREE CD Copies
HIGH COURT
TK
DATED;29/1 2/2023
JUDGMENTSA.No.1466 of 2011
DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR DEFAULTWITH COSTS
vs
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…