Jharkhand High Court

CIVIL APPEAL 05 of 1991 on 19 February 1998

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Sachin Kumar Mitra @ Sachin Mitra (Substituted vide order dated 08.08.2008)

1. a Ravindra Mitra

1. b Subir Mitra

Both S/O: Late Sachin Mitra

1. c Supriya Mitra, D/O: Late Sachin Mitra All R/O: Tantipara, Ward No. 4, P.O. +P.S. Municipality, Pakur Town, District- Pakur.

… … Plaintiff/Respondent/AppellantVersus

1. Bhagwan Das Rajdeo

2. Raj Kumar Rajdeo Both Sons of Late Newanand Ram, Proprietor of Matumal Athwani Stone Company, resident of Harindanga Bazar, ward No.4 Pakur Municipality, Police Station- Pakur Town, District- Sahibganj. Both Sons of Late Newanand Ram, Proprietor of Matumal Athwani Stone Company, resident of Harindanga Bazar, ward No.4 Pakur Municipality, Police Station- Pakur Town, District- Sahibganj.

… … Defendants/Appellants/Respondents

---

CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

---

For the Appellant : None For the Respondents : Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate : Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate : Ms. Maksuda Khatun, Advocate

---

24/09.10.2025

1. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents is present.

Page 1 of 2

3. This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 19.02.1998 (decree signed on 27.02.1998) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Pakur in Title Appeal No. 05 of 1991 setting aside the judgment dated 14.09.1990 (decree signed on 22.09.1990) in Eviction Suit No. 15 of 1984 passed by learned Sub Judge-II, Pakur.

4. The title suit was decreed by the learned trial court and the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court was set aside by the learned 1[st] appellate court. Consequently, the plaintiffs are the appellants before this Court.

5. This Court waited about 20 minutes for learned counsel for the appellant during which the learned counsel for the respondent was placing the case records and his arguments. Neither any request for adjournment has been circulated nor the learned counsel for the appellant has appeared before this Court. Consequently, this appeal is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.

6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed. 7.Let a copy of this order be communicated to the concerned court through “Fax/e-mail”.

09.10.2025Rakesh/-

Uploaded on 10.10.2025

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead