Gujarat High Court
SCA/196/1996 of NARHARIBHAI NARANBHAI BHATT Vs AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORP. on 16 December 1996
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 196 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 196 of 1996
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- NARHARIBHAI NARANBHAI BHATTVersus AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORP. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR AJ PATEL for Petitioner MR PRASHANT G DESAI for Respondent No. 1 Mr. T.H.Sompura, AGP for respondent No. 5. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Date of decision: 16/12/96
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard learned advocates for the parties. Learned advocate Mr. Patel appearing for the petitioner states that the matter at issue in this petition has been decided against the petitioner by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority vs. Manilal Gordhandas and Others [JT 1996(8) 646]. He, however, states that some of the land owners [not the petitioner] have made an application for review of the above judgment which is pending. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition and states that the petitioner shall pursue the remedy available to him in the event the review application pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court is decided in favour of the land owners. Leave is granted. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Ad - interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
16.12.1996.���
vyas