Karnataka High Court
WP/58853/2015 of SRI. VENKATESH. V. Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 31 December 2015
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY W.P.NO. 58853/2015 c/w W.P.NO.58851/2015(S-RES) W.P.NO.58853/2015 BETWEEN: Sri. Venkatesh. V. W/o. Sri. Venkatagiriyappa, Aged about 46 years, u-12, 6th Cross,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31[ST]DAY OF DECEMBER Z20LD
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY|
$W.P.NO. 58853/2015 c/w_W.P.NO.58851/2015(SRES)
W.P.NO.58853/2015
BETWEEN:
Sri. Venkatesn. V. W/o. Sri. Venkatagiriyappa,Aged about 46 years,u-12, 6th Cross, Dayanandanagar,Srirampura,Bangalore-560 021.
... PETITIONER|(By Sri. M.S. Parthasarathi, Advocate)
AND 1.The State of KarnatakaBy Its Secretary to Government, Law and Parliamentary Affairs,Vidnana Soudna, Vidnhana Veedni,Bangalore-560 O01.
2.1hne Commissioner,Collegiate Education Department,Palace Road,Bangalore-560 O01.
3. Tne Director of Collegiate Education,Palace Road, Bangalore-560 O01.
4.The Regional Joint Director of CollegiateEducation, Palace Road,Bangalore-560 O01.
5.Janatna Education Society(Vivekananda College Premises),Dr. RajKumar Road,Rajajinagar II Stage,Bangalore-560 055,By Its Secretary.
6.Vivekananda College of Law,No.12/1, 3rd Cross, Maruthi Extension, Gayathrinagar,Bangalore-560 021.By its Principal.
7.5ri.C. N. Rajanna,|Second Division Assistant,presently working at)Vivekananda Institute of Technology,Kumbaigud, Bangalore-560 074.
S.omt. B.K. AnasuyammMaTo be served througn Principal,Vivekananda college of law,No.12/1, 3rd cross,Maruthi extension, Gayatnrinagar,Bangalore-560 021.
. RESPONDENTS
(By Shri. H. Venkatesh Dodderi, AGA for R1- R4,|Snri. P.B. Ajit, Advocate for R5 —- R/7 )
W.P.NO.58851/2015
BEI|WEEN
Sri. M.N.Sudnakar, S/o Late N. Lingaian, Aged about 51 years, R/at No. 7.:[.0]Cross, Hosakerenalll, |Ganapatninagar, Bangalore — 560 026... PETITIONER|(By Sri. M.S. Parthasarathi, Advocate)
AND
1.The State of Karnataka,By its Secretary to Government,Law and Parliamentary Affairs,Vidnana Soudna, Vidnhana Veedni,Bangalore-560 O01.
2.1hne Commissioner,Collegiate Education Department,Palace Road, Bangalore-560 O01.
3. The Director of Collegiate Education,Palace Road, Bangalore-560 O01.
4.The Regional Joint Director of CollegiateEducation, Palace Road,Bangalore-560 O01.
5.Janatna Education Society(Vivekananda College Premises),Dr. RajKumar Road,Rajajinagar II Stage,Bangalore-560 055,By its Secretary.
6.Vivekananda College of Law,No.12/1, 3rd Cross, Maruthi Extension, Gayathrinagar,Bangalore-560 021.By its Principal.
7. Sri. Kumar. M,
Physical Education Director,|Vivekananda College of Law, No.12/1, 3rd Cross, Maruthi Extension, Gayathrinagar,Bangalore-560 021.
RESPONDENTS
(By Snri. H. Venkatesn Dodderi, AGA for R1- R4,.Shri. P.B. Ajit, Advocate for R5 —- RZ ).
W.P. No.58853/ 2015 is filed under Articles 226 and22/ of the Constitution of India praying to quash tne order|dated 18.6.2014 passed by R-1 on revision petition.No.03/2013 and connected matters vide Annexure -AF.insofar as the petitioner is concerned etc.
W.P.No. 58851/2015 is filed under Articles 226 and22/7 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the orderdated 18.6.2014 passed by R-1 on revision petition.No.04/2013 and connected matters vide Annexure -Pinsofar as the petitioner is concerned etc.
These petitions are coming on for — preliminarynearing in ~B’ Group this day, the Court made the,Tolowing:-—
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petitions are opposed on the ground that the petitioners ought to have filed a revision petition against the impugned order, whereas respondents insist.tnat it is an appealable order.
2. The petitioners are at liberty to prefer an appealas Claimed by the respondents. Sucn an appeal shall be)considered expeditiously, having regard to the facts andcircumstances of tne case.
3 ASthe.presentpetitionsarefiledWItNOUTchalienging any order, it is now open to the petitioners to.challenge the order by which they are aggrieved.
4. Witn the aforesaid observation, the petitions aredisposed of.
Tne learned Government Advocate is permitted to file his memo of appearance within two weeks.
Sd/-—
JUDGE.
Msu