Gujarat High Court
CRA/172/1998 of SHANTABEN MEGHJIBHAI SORATHIA Vs RAMKRISHNAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED on 14 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 172 of 1998 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 172 of 1998
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- SHANTABEN MEGHJIBHAI SORATHIA
Versus
RAMKRISHNAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR GIRISH D BHATT for Petitioner
MR HARIN P RAVAL for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
Date of decision: 14/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Mr.G.D. Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicant in this revision states that he has received telephonic instructions from the trial court advocate Mr. S.N. Acharya that the subject matter of the suit has been settled outside court and that therefore this revision is not required to be pursued any further. This revision is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
Liberty to apply in case of difficulty.