Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/3470/1993 of ROYAL WATCHCOMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs SMT. SURABHAI GARAG on 15 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No 3470 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No 3470 of 1993
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- ROYAL WATCHCOMPANY PRIVATE LIMITEDVersus SMT. SURABHAI GARAG -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BP GUPTA for Petitioners MR BB NAIK for Respondent No. 1 MR VM PANCHOLI, APP for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 15/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner produces a copy of the order dated 04.12.1997 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Range 'C' which shows that the orders of the authorities below have been set aside and the issue has been restored to the file of the A.O. with the direction that he should readjudicate upon the issue after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. In the circumstances, it is the issue after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. In the circumstances, it is agreed between learned counsel for the parties that the appropriate course would be to stay further proceedings in Criminal Case No.80 of 1992 which is pending in the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad till the Assessing Officer gives a fresh decision. There is no reason to keep the present Miscellaneous Criminal Application pending. It is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged. The Criminal Case No.80 of 1992 pending before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate shall remain stayed till the Assessing Officer passes a fresh order pursuant to the directions given by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. It is clarified that after the Assessing Officer passes the order, it will be open to the parties to move the Trial Court for appropriate orders.
hki