Supreme Court of India

NARPAT SINGH versus RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION. on 24 September 2007

Cites 0, Cited by 0

:

NARPAT SINGH

__.

A

|

RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

ely

SEPTEMBER 24, 2007

_

B[A.K. MATHURAND MARKANDEY KATJU, JJ.]

Interlocutory Application—Held : Instant I. Asfor clarificationofCourt’s order and direction are totally misconceived and areCdismissed—Moreover, ordinarily, an I.A. is maintainable only in apending case andnot aftera case isfinally disposedof[as][ in][ that][ event]Court becomesfuntus officio, andthereafter an IA. lies ordinarily onlyfor correcting clerical or accidental mistakes—Practice andProcedure.

DCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION[:][ 1A.][ Nos.][ 15-16][ of][2007]

IN:

Civil Appeal Nos. 2181-2182 of2001.

From the final Judgment and Order dated 22.5.2000 ofthe HighECourt ofJudicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, in S.B. Civil 2nd AppealNos. 447/1997 & 232/1998.

WITH

Conmt. Pet. (C) Nos. 151-152 of 2007 IN C.A. Nos. 2181-2182Fof2001.|

Sudhir Kumar Gupta for the Appellant.

|

‘Sushil Kumar Jain, Puneet Jain, Piyush Jain and H.D. Thanvi for theRespondent.

GThe following Order ofthe Court was delivered:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

We have heard learned counsel for the parties._

|

:

—

“

~

I.A. No. 15-16 for clarification and direction of Court's Order dated A 3.5.2007 are totally misconceived. Moreover, ordinarily nos. I.A. lies after a case is finally disposed of. Ordinarily, an I.A. is maintainable only in a pending case. Once a case is finally disposed of the Court becomes funcyus officio, and thereafter an I.A. lies ordinarily only for correcting clerical or , accidental mistakes. The same are accordingly, dismissed. . B

Put up the Contempt Petitions (C) No. 151 -152 of2007 in Civil Appeal No. 2181-2182 of 2001 after six months. RP. I.As. dismissed and Contempt Petition adjourned. dismissed and Contempt Petition adjourned. and Contempt Petition adjourned. Contempt Petition adjourned. Petition adjourned. adjourned.

I.As. dismissed and Contempt Petition adjourned. dismissed and Contempt Petition adjourned. and Contempt Petition adjourned. Contempt Petition adjourned. Petition adjourned. adjourned. c

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead