Karnataka High Court
RFA/1077/2007 of ABDULKHADARSAB Vs HAZARATBI on 15 December 2010
COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 15th DAY OF DECEMBER 2010 Before THE HON' BLE SHRI. JUSTICE A . S. PACHHAPURE RFA NO. 1077 OF 2007 BETWEEN: 1. ABDULKHADARSAB S/O CHOTEMIYASAB AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC: COOLIE R/O LAKSHMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801 2. SMT JAINNABI W/O IBRAHIMSAB KANAKE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 15[th]DAY OF DECKBMBER 2010
Before
THE HON’ BLE SHRI. JUSTICE A. 8S. PACHHAPUR
REA NO. 1077 OF 2007
BEIWEREN
1.ABDULKHADARSAB S/O CHOTEMIY ASAAGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC: COOLIER/O LAKSHMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC: COOLIER/O LAKSHMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801
2.SMT JAINNABI W/O IBRAHIMSAB KANAKEAGED ABOUT 63 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLWORK R/O HUBLI ROAD GADAGAGED ABOUT 63 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLWORK R/O HUBLI ROAD GADAG
3.SMT MARIAMBI W/O KHAJESAB KAGADAGARAGEI) ABOUT 47 YEARS OCC: HOUSBHOLWORK R/O HUBLI ROAD GADAG 58801AGEI) ABOUT 47 YEARS OCC: HOUSBHOLWORK R/O HUBLI ROAD GADAG 58801
—~ APPELLANTS
(By Sri./Smt : JAYAKUMAR S. PATIL & ASSOCIATE FORSADIO.N.GOODWALA AND DEVI PRASAD SHETTY. (ADVS.)
AND
1.HAZARATBI W/O ABDULNABISAB PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 63 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLD WORR/AT HALLE ASARI ONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLD WORR/AT HALLE ASARI ONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801
2.DADESAB S/O ABDULNABISAB PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OCC: HOUSBHOLD WORKR/AT HALLE ASARI ONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OCC: HOUSBHOLD WORKR/AT HALLE ASARI ONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801
3.MOHAMMEDSAB S/O ABDULNABISAB PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 41 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLD WORR/AT HALLE ASARI ONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLD WORR/AT HALLE ASARI ONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801
4.HAJRESAB S/O ABDULNABISAB PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 39 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLD WORKR/AT HALLE ASARI ONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAGAGED ABOUT 39 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLD WORKR/AT HALLE ASARI ONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG
5.MIYASAB S/O ABDULNABISAB PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 37 YEAS R/AT HALLE ASARIONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801AGED ABOUT 37 YEAS R/AT HALLE ASARIONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801
6.IBRAHIMSAB S/O ABDULNABISAB PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT HALLE ASARIONI LAXMEBESHWAR DIST GADAG 588AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT HALLE ASARIONI LAXMEBESHWAR DIST GADAG 588
7.SULEMANSAB S/O ABDULNABISAB PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT HALLE ASARIONI LAXMEBSHWAR DIST GADAAGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT HALLE ASARIONI LAXMEBSHWAR DIST GADA
8.MAHBOOBSAB S/O ABDULNABISAB PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT HALLE ASARIONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT HALLE ASARIONI LAXMESHWAR DIST GADAG 58801
9.SMT MALMABI W/O IMAM JAFFER PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC: COOLIER/AT JAWAHAR NAGAR HUBLI 58801AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC: COOLIER/AT JAWAHAR NAGAR HUBLI 58801
10.ASHFAQ S/O IMAM JAFFER PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 28 YBAS OCC: BANKSERVICE R/O HUBLI 58801AGED ABOUT 28 YBAS OCC: BANKSERVICE R/O HUBLI 58801
11.TAHIR S/O IMAM JAFFER PATWEGARAGED ABOUT 23 YEARSOCC: BUSINES R/O HUBLI 58801AGED ABOUT 23 YEARSOCC: BUSINES R/O HUBLI 58801
12.SMT PRAVIN BANU W/O MODINSAB KAGADAGARAGED ABOUT 31 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLD WORR/O HUBLI ROAD GADAG 58801AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS OCC: HOUSKBHOLD WORR/O HUBLI ROAD GADAG 58801
13.SMT NILOFAR W/O RIYAZ AHMED KHATIBAGEI)D ABOUT 25 YEARS OCC: HOUSBHOWORK R/O HUBLI 58801
—. RESPONDENTS
(By Sri./Smt: S.S. PATIL ADV. FOR R 9 TO 13. SRI.BASAVARA).M.MEKKT ADV. FOR RI-R3 & RS TO R38
This RFA filed U/S 96 of CPC against the judgement and decree dated22.02.2007 passed in O. S. No. 217/2004 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.)and C]M, Gadag.
This Appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passedthe tollowing Order}
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
“Six weeks time is granted to submit the paper books. If the paperbooks are not submitted within six weeks, the appeal stands dismissed withoutreterence to the Bench’’
|} /COPY
SD /-JUDGE
As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 28/03/2014, theAdvocate for the Appellant has not complied with the office objections,Hence, this RFA No. 1077/2007 stands dismissed as per the Court Orderdated: 15/12/2010.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Sd/-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T- By: amd|R- By;C- By;R- By;C- By;