Supreme Court of India
RE: VIJAY KURLE & ORS. versus . on 21 March 2022
[2022] 2 S.C.R. 819
RE: VIJAY KURLE & ORS.
(Miscellaneous Application No. 486 of 2022)
In
(Suo Motu Contempt Petition (CRL.) No. 2 of 2019)
MARCH 21, 2022
Judgment/Order – Correction of typographical error – In paragraphno.7, ‘92) of Article 142’ to be read as ‘(2) of Article 142’ – Miscellaneousapplication allowed.
INHERENT JURISDICTION: Miscellaneous Application No. 486of 2022 In Suo Moto Contempt Petition (CRL.) No. 2 of 2019.
From the Judgment and Order dated 04.05.2020 in SMC (Crl)No.2 of 2019 of this Court.
Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Nitin Saluja, Nilesh C. Ojha, Prem SunderJha, Ishwarlal S. Agarwal, Ms. Dipali N. Ojha, Pratik Jain Saklecha,Abhishek Mishra, Ms. Siddhi A. Dhamnaskar, Ms. Snehal S. Surve, Ms.Poonam P. Rajbhar, Ms. Deepika G. Jaiswal, Mangesh B. Dongre, SohanR. Agate, Pritam Bishwas, Anant Misra Advs. for the appearing parties.
The following Order of the Court was passed:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
In terms of the office report, the suggested corrigendum, as statedinfra, be carried out in the judgment delivered on 27-04-2020:- M.A. No. 486 of 2022 stands allowed.
Ankit Gyan
Petition allowed.
819
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H