Gujarat High Court
SCA/2201/2000 of VRUNDAVAN ICE CREAM Vs ANUPAMKUMAR THAKKAR on 14 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2201 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2201 of 2000
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- VRUNDAVAN ICE CREAM
Versus
ANUPAMKUMAR THAKKAR
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR KM PATEL for Petitioner
MR RD RAVAL for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
Date of decision: 14/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
#. The petitioner - employer has filed this petition challenging the award of the Labour Court, Vadodara passed in Reference (LCV) No.46/92 by which the reference was partly allowed and the respondent - workman herein was ordered to be reinstated with 25% backwages.
#. Since the matter has been admitted, today by consent of the parties, it is taken up for final hearing.
#. Mr.Raval for the respondent - workman states that the respondent - workman is willing to accept Rs.35,000/(Rupees Thirty Five Thousand Only) in all in lieu of his reinstatement and backwages as awarded by the Labour Court.
#. Mr.K.M.Patel, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner is also willing to pay the aforesaid amount by way of settlement of entire dispute.
#. In view of the aforesaid consensus between the parties, impugned award dated 15.6.1999 of the Labour Court is modified and instead of reinstatement and 25% backwages, the petitioner will have to pay in all Rs.35,000/- (Rupees Thirty Five Thousand Only) to the respondent - workman which will satisfy the entire claim of the respondent - workman on receiving the said amount. It is clarified that, on receiving the aforesaid amount by the respondent - workman, all type of claims of the respondent - workman shall stands satisfied. Mr.Patel for the petitioner states that the amount of Rs.35,000/- will be paid to the respondent - workman by way of Cross Cheque on or before 31.12.2000.
#. The petition is accordingly partly allowed to the aforesaid extent. The award of the Labour Court is modified as stated above. There shall be no order as to costs.
�����(P.B.Majmudar,J)
(pathan)