Gujarat High Court
CRA/1253/1982 of JAGDISHBHAI LALLUBHAI PATEL Vs SHANTABEN ISHWARBHAI PATEL on 6 November 1995
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.1253 OF 1982 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Y.B. BHATT: ============================================================= 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.1253 OF 1982
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Y.B. BHATT:
=============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
Mr. G.M. Joshi, advocate for the petitioner.
Miss V.P. Shah, advocate for the respondents.
------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: Y.B. BHATT J.
Date of Decision: 12-12-1995
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGEMENT
1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties.
As a result of the hearing, a consensus has been arrived at between the learned counsel (after consulting their respective clients), and accordingly it is directed that the petitioner-tenant is granted time upto 28th February 1996 to vacate the suit premises, on condition that the petitioner files an undertaking in this court on usual terms in this regard, latest by 20th December 1995.
2. It is clarified that if the undertaking as aforesaid is not filed by the due date or in case of breach of any of the terms and conditions contained in the said undertaking, the decree shall become executable forthwith. 3. This revision is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Subject to the aforesaid direction, interim relief is vacated.
*******